There is a time for everything under the sun. That includes the sale of Leonardo da Vinci’s Salvator Mundi painting (now finally certified to be his and not a disciple’s) in New York’s Christie’s on November 15th.
Astrology has a bad name because it claims to be able to predict issues and like meteorology often fails at the job. When it does appear to have correctly predicted things it is then dismissed as a system of irreligious fatalism or unscientific divination that must have worked due to everything from intervention of fallen angels (St Augustine) to just chance. Neither judgement is correct.
The fact is that though astrology can foreshadow events that astrologers would often need to be outright prophets to be able even to imagine ahead of time, what it really does is certify events as they happen. This it does with great clarity as in the case of the Leonardo sale.
Leonardo whose birth data we know approximately from Vasari ( 9.40 pm, 23 April, greg, 1452 at Vinci), was born with Saturn at 14 degrees of the arts and luxuries sign of Libra. Saturn is about antiques and property. On the 15th November, action-generating and competitive Mars is transiting conjunct Leonardo’s Saturn at 14 Libra. This is an indication both of the involvement of competitive auction and, rather importantly, that the picture really is Leonardo’s or this kind of degree exact agreement wouldn’t be occurring.
Mercury, the news and communications factor, is at nearly 13 of Sagittarius for the auction date meaning it’s suitably in the artist’s first house (his image, his body) loosely conjunct his ascendant degree – 6 Sagittarius was rising over the horizon at the birth as given. Since however Leonardo wasn’t born in the era of digital timing, it’s very likely the position of Mercury at auction is telling us he was born some time a bit later than assumed with Sagittarius at or nearer 13 degrees at birth. Undeniably the more important events of a life are liable to engage the angles of a nativity and an individual’s ascendant angle is sensitive.
THE SALVATOR MUNDI THEME
Events in religion, which in its way the sale and widespread discussion of Leonardo’s painting is, enjoy some association with the Galactic Centre presently in late Sagittarius at 26 degrees. On the day of the auction, transiting Saturn (antiques, tradition, the historical) enters this degree.
What about the moon and the theme setting sun?. I can’t tell at what time a price will be agreed, but whenever it is the event-timing moon will be in Libra and we have seen the relevance to both the event and the cost value of the picture of Libra due to Leonardo’s natal Saturn in the sign. (Leonardo incidentally also had visionary Neptune in Libra on O degrees at birth. This degree being a world point and within conjunction of Leonardo’s Midheaven (career, reputation and destiny), Neptune is a factor in the artist’s becoming world famous not least for the mysterious sfumato and chiraroscuro effects which “dreamy” Neptune naturally favours. Also on a world point and thus making for fame was Mars at 15 Aquarius, futuristic sign of inventions for which Leonardo was in demand and very notable).
The sun is at 22 Scorpio on 15th November and this is interesting at the more religious level.
In the correct and still working birth data which in enlargement of the D’Ochieppo and Hughes (astronomers) thesis for the birth of Christ I claim to possess, the asteroid Leonardo is at 14 Virgo. This means it is in what’s called semi-sextile aspect to the mentioned transiting Mars and the natal Saturn which are conjunct on the 15th November. This might not seem important because a semi-sextile is a minor 30 degree aspect – except for one vital point in this instance. Semi-sextiles are deemed to be financial and the 15th is going to produce major issues around finances. What is the painting worth? Will it produce record breaking bids? (It is set for one hundred million). The fact that Jupiter and Venus are conjunct in the heavens (they were exact on the 13th) bespeaks a time of big money deals, this pair in aspect is typically about wealth and any lifestyles of the rich and famous.
But what is the painting about? On the 15th November the sun is at 22/23 of Scorpio. In the natus of Jesus the asteroid Salavat (Salvation) is at 21.59 Scorpio, i.e. one minute of a degree off 22 Scorpio. There is no Salvator (Saviour) asteroid, so Salavat ( Salvation) is the nearest we can get to it, but I have found after years of working with them that the asteroids have a way of signifying facts through many languages and neat variations on a theme rather in the style of Joyce’ Finnegan’s Wake. There is also no World/Mundus asteroid or none in aspect unless one cared to allow Universitas (world) in very wide conjunction at 28 Scorpio.
THE JESUS IMAGE IN ART AND LIFE,
Given the prestige of Leonardo and the sheer ambition of the painting, we may legitimately ask how successful (beyond purely aesthetic considerations) it actually is in conveying an image of Jesus whether as person or saviour. In terms of mystery it is obviously reasonably successful, an effect arrived at by supplying, and not for the first time in a Leonardo painting, an androgynous edge to its subject. This however is not per se inappropriate for someone even biblically described as both incarnate Logos and feminine Sophia (masculine Word and Feminine Wisdom). For these issues see my recent Jesus and Sexuality you tube https://goo.gl/L7KR2C ,
Even so, did the Jesus who worked as a carpenter (more likely a builder or stone mason) and went fishing with his disciples, look quite like this or even anything like this? Actually if, as I seriously maintain, it is possible to arrive at accurate, working data for Jesus’ birth, then we can more or less know what he looked like. I have discussed this at some length and worked towards an image based on the most characteristic features and interactions of the natal sun sign and rising sign, the chief factors governing an individual’s appearance. To my surprise and sometimes frustration, the relevant article, Colton Burpo’s “Real” Heaven, Akiane’s Jesus and New Christ Images at https://wp.me/p2v96G-lH published in Feb 2014, easily remains after years the most visited of my blog offerings despite what I consider more substantial writings on religion and some major poetry for the exploring. Plainly people really are interested in just what Jesus looked like!. In a way the emphasis belongs with the almost endless ironies that attend the whole Jesus theme…..
EXPENSIVE IMAGES AND PRICELESS INFORMATION
The auction of a Jesus image involving huge sums of money is ironic both in relation to the relative poverty of its subject historically and the fact that, such are the vagaries of fortune, it is not so long ago in 1958 that the picture had been sold in auction for a mere 45 GB pounds! …..
Art is of course art and religion is religion and they only sometimes meet, but I could be allowed some disgust at the fact that while almost obscene amounts of wealth, plus plentiful media coverage, get directed upon a beautiful but imperfect Christ image, it is next to impossible for me to present as author, as doctor of religious studies and astrologer what in its way is as good as priceless information, gold of the Magi itself, the clearest demonstrable solution to millennia old mystery surrounding the birth of Christ. Where others speculate I can prove. But this is ignored (as is that the theory I enlarge upon is one that has long enjoyed considerable academic support and was declared by the scholarly Pope Benedict as distinctly plausible as theories of the birth go).
Forget the too often whorish world of Anglo-American publishing about which I could tell some tales. I am ashamed of the places of my two nationalities (Australia and Ireland) that have not had the least room for indications of my information. For example, before last Christmas six leading papers of Australia failed so much as to respond to a proposed author’s op-ed on proof of an historic discovery. I have not got anything into Irish media either, whether the Irish Times, the Irish Independent or, despite my direct appeal while in Ireland this year, the national broadcaster’s Sunday Miscellany which is supposed to specialize in original material from authors. This isn’t good enough.
Because it’s wrong to cast pearls and would demean the subject to go around with a begging bowl insisting to be heard, there are limits to how much, how often I ever deal with this subject which I have carried and represented for years. But where our leaders of opinion secular and religious in their dismissive arrogance are