RSS

Category Archives: gay

THE “DIVINE” MACRON AND THE TURNING OF THE AGES

HIDDEN SYMBOLS AND MOTIVES

People and history are influenced far more than is recognized by symbol and archetype and a whole hidden subconscious order of reality. Speaking in Versailles, ancient home of the Sun King, Emmanuel Macron, France’s new and youthful president, declared according to a much cited Reuters report one must presume is true, that he wished to realize “a Jupiterian presidency”. He would be “a remote, dignified figure like the Roman god of gods who weighs his rare pronouncements carefully”. How should we assess this?

First, and quite simply – except to those who completely dismiss astrology – Macron is a Sagittarian born under a sign traditionally “ruled” by precisely Jupiter. So he has affinity for that planet’s feelings and associations but very much so and with some consequence for the astonished world. In Macron’s case Jupiter natally conjuncts a solstice or world point (O Cancer) within less than the requisite one and a half degrees for real effect.

Not only that but the same Jupiter closely and fortunately trines Macron’s Midheaven angle. This angle is associated with reputation, destiny and career. A bit of a fantasist or exaggerator in the style of Sagittarians, Macron wishes to be seen as precisely a Jupiterian, even divine figure.

There is however arguably more to this than the imposition of a personal trait upon affairs. The fact that Macron admits to and expresses his archetypal affinities at all (most would keep such extreme statements private!) is unusual but particularly striking is that he does so at this time. Also notable is the way the issue of Macron’s pretensions more generally have been taken up by the public as in  The Economist magazine. This has offered readers a cover that depicts the new president walking the sea like the Christ of the gospels.  I would suggest there is a  bit more than  just easy satire in this but some real if unconscious archetypal input here.

The fact is that Jupiter, the planet of grace, luck, faith and optimism does not “rule” only Sagittarius. It also “rules” Pisces, water sign of the imagination, compassion and the seas. Until Neptune was discovered and for empirical reasons given co-rulership of Pisces, Jupiter was Pisces’ sole ruler. Pisces and Neptune moreover “rule” the feet. It follows that in symbolic logic walking the waters should be the ultimate Piscean miracle or demonstration of authority. So Macron, whose very name is Emmanuel (one of Jesus’ names and meaning “God with us”) gets linked in this way as a “saviour” figure.

CHRISTIANITY, ASTROLOGY AND THE AGES

It is unfortunate and ironic that through recourse to selective reading that has allowed empirical astrology to be classed with random divination opposed by the Hebrew prophets, Christianity, the religion that is almost introduced through a star and astrologers, has rejected astrology. It does so to the extent it cannot read and grasp even the most basic celestial signs. Otherwise it might have been obvious that the era of Christianity had something to do with Pisces, with the life of Christ as Fisher of men, Lord of the Seas, a kind of Neptune to stride the waves, at the same time as Jesus preaches a Jupiterian gospel of grace, forgiveness and compassion. Many Christians still haven’t worked out or refuse to believe that the Star of Bethlehem was itself Jupiter in a section of Pisces relevant to Israel.

In the years immediately before Jesus’ birth a great revolution in consciousness had begun, one that was also Jupiterian but less generously. Augustus Caesar under whom Jesus was born, had begun to depict himself as Jupiter, Divi Filius, Son of God. This initiated the imperial cult under which the first Christians would suffer because they could not acknowledge the deity of Roman emperors –one of them being the super extravagant Sagittarian, Nero.

An era, measured by the procession of the Equinox, lasts something over two millennia – the precise length cannot be exactly determined – but this means that we now stand at the end of Piscean era. That also means we stand, at the equivalent of the 29th degree of the sign in common chart measurements. 29 degrees of any sign is deemed extreme, unstable and insatiable, it is like the last high flare of a candle.

If and when astrology predicts it only does so  in light of what has occurred in the past under similar celestial factors  (a reason it is not “divination” of the common sort). Accordingly…..what is manifested at the beginning of the era can and will echo and repeat at the end of the era and may even do so strongly…..

THE JUPITER SYMBOLISM  RETURNS

Arguably something of this is happening now. Of and by itself one probably shouldn’t take Macron’s more extravagant declarations too seriously. Although our political leaders do often enough belong to secret societies which teach  values (including globalism) and visions that could shock electorates if they knew of them, there is no need to buy into the kind of extravagant conspiracy theories which would render the new president some kind of servant of the Illuminati or even the Antichrist.

What however we are hearing via Macron is a new trend, a new end-of-era mood, one which will make it easier to accept and follow the kind of leader who does set himself up as a virtual Caesar or even deity. We may suspect Macron’s outlook is akin to that of the late Belgian statesman Paul-Henri Spaak considered a founder of the same EU Macron zealously supports. He once declared:

“What we want is a man of sufficient stature to hold the alliances of all people and to lift us out of the economic morass into which we are sinking. Send us this man and be he god or devil, we will receive him”.

Here is an invitation to figures of the Antichrist variety who may be more willingly heard at the current end of the Christian era as we know it, the time of Christianity’s confusion, decadence, doubt and decline almost to be expected: “Yet, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?” (Luk 18:8). The rhetorical question would seem to imply the negative.

So will a person of Spaak’s kind appear? All I can say, since I cannot know whether the late Seeress Jeane Dixon saw true or was deluded, is that the Antichrist of her visions (the supposed point of her life according to herself) if he exists, must and will appear soon.. He must do so within around 6 months from the two highly significant August eclipses of this year. For all sorts of reasons his exceptional birth pattern (which of course Christians who don’t even recognize the signs of Christ’s birth can’t and won’t appreciate)  is too strongly affected for this not to be the case. And a troubled confused world could be ready for him and the biblically forecast great deception

.

OTHER POINTS OF INTEREST CONCERNING MACRON’S NATUS

The youngest French president ever. His sun is closely conjuncted by Mercury the planet of youth.

His name is Emmanuel.    Emanuela (traditionally asteroids were registered in the feminine form of a name ) closely trines the reputation Midheaven from the visible first house of persona. This helps insure fame for Emmanuel. Fama (fame) is moreover  in the tenth house of career/reputation and favourably aspected to the precise degree to the connective, fated nodes (plus he has the mentioned  ruling Jupiter on a world point). Cumulatively this adds up to certain fame.

Persistent rumours of a gay reputation.  With Mars closely square Uranus plus Moon opposite Uranus, the gay planet, these are classic gay aspects if of the more conflicted kind. Also the giveaway gay asteroid Gaily is in close aspect to the president’s reputation Midheaven. However I have said from the first Macron is really more bisexual (necessarily so since he has chosen to be married to a much older woman).  This is reflected in Neptune conjunct Venus with Neptune in neurotic inconjunct (quincunx aspect) to the moon. An afflicted Neptune is the basic building block of any bisexual disposition which is a more floating condition than the fixed gay one (the reason fundamentalist Christians and others can report “gay” cures while gays continue to insist, correctly enough, that they are “born that way” ).

Born in Amiens.   The Amiens asteroid is not conjunct or inside Macron’s fourth house of home and origins, but interestingly it does trine his moon, general symbol of home and family which being opposite Uranus could well have been quite a strange one.

Thinking in terms of divinity.   Macron is quite simply vain. With Venus very widely conjunction the sun and asteroid Lucifer closely trine his Mars in royal Leo, he has a high view of himself and this stretches into the religion in which so many Sagittarians locate themselves. Uranus in the ninth of religion is in any case a significator of  unusual religious views or activity while opposite the moon, the energies of belief are opposed to home and family which in Macron’s case was secular/atheistic. Macron as a good Sagittarian liable to argue and dispute over beliefs, chose to attend a Jesuit school though what he absorbed there raises questions.

A president oddly for and against France. Macron refuses to recognize a French culture or art at the same time as he wants to lead the destiny of France and makes declarations like the Sun King from Versailles. Why? Asteroid Franzia (France) is suitably strong and highlighted on an angle but not on the career or origins one but rather the unions one which can be a very conflicted point. It represents both open enemies and close relations in a pattern akin to the Taming of the Shrew.  I should say Macron’s outlook cannot be easily known but is rather opportunistic/pragmatic in the style of so many politicians.

 

 

 
1 Comment

Posted by on July 11, 2017 in astrology, gay, Mysteries, religion

 

THINKING ABOUT DISNEY’S “GAY MOMENT”

CHANGING THE STYLES

When I was young I was never a great fan of Disney films. Donald Duck might be OK but cartoonish versions of classic fairy tales were mostly a turn off, too knockabout  and yankee doodle. Early taken to those fairy tale-like villages and palaces of Mitteleuropa, I always felt I knew, helped by some classic illustrations, just how those stories should be rendered to screen but weren’t.

From what I would gather from clips, Beauty and the Beast which premieres in America on March 17th, promises to be closer to what I always imagined should have been a Disney treatment of fantasy. But just at the moment it becomes in some respects more fantastic real and European it also becomes a little bit gay too, briefly perhaps and almost exclusively towards its end, but evidently enough so to upset a sizeable minority of American citizens and some members of the Russian establishment. The latter regard it as bordering on forbidden “gay propaganda” but the nation has settled for a 16 + rating so that children won’t be influenced.  The chief “moment” – about two seconds of two men dancing together – is nevertheless said to be so subtle it’s likely to go over children’s heads anyway.

I understand that no one is called gay or admits to be so the length of the film, but there are occasional vague hints LeFou, the companion of Gaston, could have something like a man crush on Gaston straight though the latter is. The film’s director does understand LeFou’s character to be gay but many may not. The sudden controversy over what seems not too much could owe something to the fact Beauty’s innovatory “moment” comes to the big screen in the wake of another recent but small screen “moment” in a more typically Disneyesque  cartoon series, Star vs the Force of Evil.  Amid a celebrating crowd, gay couples are briefly seen to kiss and again you might almost miss it. But what has now been labelled the show’s “unbiblical kiss”  has drawn thousands of signatures from the Million Moms group (though given how many men kiss and embrace in the bible, “unbiblical kiss” can itself sound a trifle queer in the original sense of odd). Some Christians are however now debating how best to tell their children why they can’t be allowed to see Beauty and the Beast. 

HOW FAIRIE ARE FAIRY TALES?

Disney’s ostensible aim in this instance is to be, as it has always aimed to be, “inclusive”, a buzz word and almost automatic policy in liberal circles today. Ironically however, one might well ask whether Disney, no matter how accidentally, has not finally arrived closer to the spirit of a lot of fairy tale material not just in setting and atmosphere but in being a bit alternative too.

I don’t seriously suggest that Grimm, Perrault etc were senders of closet gay/queer messages albeit, for what the information is worth, Jacob Grimm never married. Tales like Cinderella can be allowed their romantic/straight vision of things.  Even so, a case can be made that “fairy tales” are a bit of a medium of expression for those persons themselves often called “fairies”. I made this point over a decade ago as a minor thesis within my at the time highly original doctoral thesis on gay spiritualities subsequently published in 2004 as A Special Illumination. goo.gl/qAqukK

From Oscar Wilde to Peter Cashorali (Fairy Tales: Traditional Stories retold for Gay Men), gays are masters of the genre with its observation and often subversion of custom. A Grimm’s tale like The Boy Who Wanted to Know What Fear Was, hints that marriage happy ever after and heterosex might not be so desirable, but rather something to be frightened of. In The Tale of the Two Brothers, who is that man in the woods who wants to adopt and mentor (classic gay roles) the lost sons of the brothers ? Why is he alone in the woods?

Inclusive though it wishes to be, it seems that Disney was somewhat pressured by ideologues of LGBT to include further. It will be clear from various blog articles that I don’t terribly like the direction in which especially American LGBT policy has been going. It’s arriving at something like the bullying of conscience and legal penalization of Christians. There are some tiresomely narrow Christians but all said and done why should they bake cakes for gay weddings if they don’t believe they should and be dragged to court and possibly have their livelihood ruined if they don’t comply? Would Democrats reckon to be forced to employ Republicans in their staff on the grounds of “equality” and “inclusion”? Some inequality and exclusion is a regular even necessary part of life. There’s a point beyond which no gay or straight person should impose themselves on society…..

DEMOCRACY WITHOUT VIOLENCE

However… where the Disney film is concerned, I don’t have democratic sympathies elastic enough to be generous to conservative protest and would-be boycotts and censorships…If you believe in democratic rights and freedom of gays within society at all, and especially if your idealism would wish that same-sex orientated persons interact at some level beyond the merely ghettoed, hidden and/or pornographic, then you must allow them what Disney is allowing them: the right to be seen, mentioned or self-declared. Also to help get beyond America’s unusually rigid  traditional gendering which until quite recently has too often been of the “Me Tarzan, You Jane variety” in a way to hurt many people, not just gays.

if you can’t consent to  this you are somewhere between blinkered or hypocritical. You put yourself in the socially retro position akin to that of Russia where homosexuality is technically legal but so practically unmentionable that any amount of homophobic violence is turned a blind eye to. And let’s face it, American Christians have traditionally allowed the bullying of gays and almost anyone different as a matter of course, accepting it as perhaps merely inevitable and deserved.

That attitude belongs to a whole social history that needs repenting before the spiritual atmosphere can be cleared; but far from any such thing happening the intolerance/aggression connection continues. Ironically I even note that the same evangelist, Franklin Graham, who has commended a cinema that refuses to show Beauty and the Beast and would like a general boycott of the film, is friend to the same pastor Saaed Abedini who has recently been guilty of breaking a restraining order put on him for abuse of his spouse. Abedini is OK in Franklin’s house though the increasingly conservative evangelist  is on record as declaring gays “the enemy” whom one shouldn’t allow into one’s home.

Not to be free to be known for what you are only makes for dangerous repression in the person who is “other” and for mixed, confused signals within straight society like women who don’t know who they are dating and dealing with. And even if you still believe there can be no possible justification for “homosexuality” as you define it, it is still not helpful to the young to have its existence hidden from their eyes and arsenal of general knowledge. So why criticize Disney? Go and enjoy the film…

ALONE TOGETHER: THE FINALLY ADMITTED UNHAPPY GAY PHENOMENON

……With that said I could leave the matter except that I almost need to make a Part Two or Addendum to cover something else that has cropped up at this time. It  has its connection to what I’ve been saying through its challenge to the very idea of being able to enjoy anything gay associated.

The same evangelical Christian Post which has featured re the Disney scandal has given room, yet again, to the inflexibly conservative Michael Brown (for whom homosexuality is just a curable disease or “lifestyle”, not any authentic or inborn orientation), to draw attention to an admittedly  significant recent article by gay writer, Michael Hobbes. The feature is Together Alone: The Epidemic of Gay Loneliness and it actually made it into the liberal Huffington Post (goo.gl/Jq9wsQ).  In light of it Brown cites the notable negatives of gay existence, which doubtless he is not unpleased to stress at a time when it has been claimed that the level of social acceptance implied by legal acceptance of gay marriage has in a short time reduced the chronic gay youth suicide rate in relevant societies by 7% .

Hobbes’ article stresses how despite all the advances in gay freedoms, virtually nothing has changed or improved. It tells how gays, many of whom spend (waste) their lives partying and chasing drugs, have fewer close friends and meaningful social lives than straights, are often (perhaps due to insecurities) unpleasantly mean to one another, and health-wise suffer more from cardiovascular disease, cancer, incontinence, allergies, asthma, erectile dysfunction. And overall there are more deaths from suicide than AIDS. Not just in America but even in Europe and liberal Sweden, places where difference is easier to realize than group conformist America, the facts are still confronting.

One could argue Hobbes’ picture is American extreme – healthy and well-adjusted gays do actually exist, I’ve known them – but I also recognize a lot of truth here too. The picture, by any standards grim, is the kind that the liberal press and tolerant society don’t know or don’t want to acknowledge but help nothing by pretending doesn’t exist. Yet however accidentally, I believe the truth, along with the possibility of a real healing linked to a sense of meaning and purpose, is contained in Hobbes’ conclusion: “We keep waiting for the moment when we feel like we’re not different from other people. But the fact is, we are different. It’s about time we accept that and work with it.”

DELIVERANCE TO AND IN  DIFFERENCE

…..It is indeed high time and past it. Gays are different mentally, even somewhat constitutionally – much like the artists which quite a few notable gays have been. (Earlier eras might have called them constitutionally neurasthenic types). As a neighbour in London’s much artist inhabited Chelsea once asked me: ”Have you ever met a contented, well-adjusted artist?” Almost never and a reading in the biographies of most writers, poets, painters, actors and musicians across history including the religious ones, won’t alter the impression substantially. Such turmoil and often tragedy!  And an honest reading of even various biblical figures like he poetic David who valued the love of men above that of women and the troubled unmarried Jeremiah who lived with Baruch, bespeak sexual marginality and its complexes and I would make a strong case for Jeremiah’s psychology being fundamentally gay (See Three Gay Theological Poems and its Jeremiah’s Loincloth  goo.gl/dOHgGC). Be that as it may….expanded or marginal vision, marked creativity and its accompanying sensitivity all take their toll on the system and impose special responsibilities.

It might seem obvious that gays are different, yet plainly to quite a few it isn’t. The secular mind is as blinkered as the conservative religious one when it comes to the real meanings and uses of sexual orientation. Gays and their straight supporters delight in stressing “equality”, “inclusiveness” and a potential or actual “sameness” (Andrew Sullivan’s “virtually normal”) rather than essential difference needing special management. This year’s Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras made “equality” it’s special theme. It’s all feel good largely irrelevant hooey but due to the American influence upon Gay Lib, LGBT agendas get framed in the light of those American values that long ago the himself Socialist and Liberal Bernard Shaw dismissed as untrue. People are not in many respects born equal and there never can and will be perfect equality. As to the right to the pursuit of happiness that too is a tricky one. Some of the world’s greatest achievements are born of a necessary suffering. Too much striving for happiness can itself create the very opposite as arguably some American lifestyles amply demonstrate.

I have been insisting on essential gay difference and the need to work with it for years. Despite obtaining a world first doctorate in gay spiritualities from any religion studies dept and this research being subsequently published as the mentioned A Special Illumination,  I have been largely dismissed and ignored for it to a degree I now scarcely bother to make the important point further. All the while I have been painfully aware that too many persons, including academic leaders from Michel Foucault to Marcella-Althaus Reid who noisily espoused the basically amoral queer theory that teaches “identity without essence” and which virtually turns life into one long bi or pan sexual experiment, just don’t help gays to justify or manage their existence. Some might even be said to be exploiters of difficulty who lead confused minds to hell in a hand basket rather like Timothy Leary preaching the drug culture to sixties youth.

“Homosexuality is wasted on gay people” is one of the more meaningful statements for today from queer theorist, David Halperin. I’d say it often is; and my position is close to that of Camille Paglia in regarding homosexuality as one of the more crucial, vital elements in cultures (especially the western since the Greeks) and even, for good and ill, within religion.  It is absolutely necessary to recognize and work with what homosexuality is and does in society and to be rid of the mere lies and superstition that it’s all and always bad, something to be feared, suppressed and even unmentioned.  Without yet seeing the film, the controversy around Beauty and the Beast sounds like a storm in an evangelical tea cup amid which it’s just possible that Disney is helping something.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 10, 2017 in creativity, gay, religion

 
 
%d bloggers like this: