RSS

Category Archives: Mysteries

LIGHT ON THE BETHLEHEM STAR/COMET/ALIGNMENT DEBATES

magiblue2

SOME PEOPLE WILL SAY ALMOST ANYTHING ABOUT THE STAR….

[UPDATE: CHRISTIAN TODAY  BYPASSES INFO BELOW TO FEATURE ARTICLE ON THE B STAR – KNOWN VIA C.S.LEWIS’ NARNIA! bit.ly/2h3AJpS ]

To cut to the chase in this issue, let’s get some things out of the way first. There are some rather complicated and silly theories about the Bethlehem Star that have drawn a lot of attention and even been the subject of films.

One of them wishes to associate Christ’s birth with Jupiter/Venus conjunctions in 3 and 2 BC which if astrology concerned the Magi at all, and it did, would be ridiculous. Jupiter/Venus is about riches, success and the good life, the sort of thing the crucified Jesus denied his natural Jupiterian kingship did not experience; and good astrology is about what is and what will be, not what merely could be. Royal Jupiter prominent would need to suffer modification and challenge from somewhere. This it did from Saturn in 7 BC if one follows the D’Occhieppo/Hughes theory from two noted astronomers that was widely praised in academic circles back in the late seventies and mentioned more recently by Pope Benedict in his The Infancy Narratives (2012) as a plausible explanation of the facts. (7 BC as a birth date is disfavoured by some because it wouldn’t make Jesus “about thirty” at the time of his ministry, but  as ages could be counted in multiples of five 30 could indicate anything from 30 to 35).

Another Star theory from such as Michael Molnar and in recent days the astronomer Grant Matthews, would link Jesus’s birth to planetary phenomena involving bellicose Aries, sign of the outgoing era (incoming was Pisces), a sign with perhaps the least automatic association with Jesus’ life and character. Matthews even seems to imagine the Saturn which is part of his alignment, is a giver of life – hardly the most standard image of Saturn whether ancient or modern. Basically both scientists and conservative Christians are in harmony to wish astrology out of the picture as far as possible…..which only helps to keep the ignorance and confusion going. (The Christians never explain why not even the Essenes and Talmudic rabbis considered astrology “divination” against the Law).

The claims for a comet are more persuasive and I come to that presently, but first for a bit of frank dogmatism.

THE BETHLEHEM STAR DEFINITELY WAS….

As per the D’Occhieppo’/Hughes thesis which I have radically developed and may be said to have completed, the Bethlehem Star itself was Jupiter at 19 Pisces during its second conjunction with Saturn in Pisces in 7 BC….

If anyone could now possibly doubt this after reading the mass of evidence given in my Testament of the Magi, goo.gl/I28aCm for the total pattern that the emphasized, relevant Jupiter oversees, let them get back and tell me. It could be a tough job, one which perhaps especially unbelievers might prefer to avoid altogether rather than tackle for its striking revelations. No other birth data for Jesus can begin to rival it with everything from the Part of Brothers conjunct asteroid James to the natal sun (the core identity) conjunct the Part of Redemption in the case of someone called the Redeemer. Flukes and coincidences can occur to mislead in any research enterprise, but not on the scale I produce. You couldn’t invent it. The picture can’t not be Jesus described through an unprecedented tell-all birth chart (for which of course a godless media and publishing has “no room at the inn” – not so much as an author’s op ed in a paper drawing attention to an historic discovery!).

The data is so efficient it even works, as a true chart should, for Jesus events to this day….it has even been doing so in the last few days with the tiresome intervention of Grant Matthews to distort matters through his suggestions there was no Bethlehem star. It’s a claim advanced just as transiting Saturn (restriction, doubt) makes what’s called affliction square aspect to the Jupiter of Christ’s birth and at that from the organized religions and universities sign of Sagittarius. (So the waters just had to be muddied, and the disproof rather than proofs that too many  now want, promoted by someone from the noted Catholic University of Notre Dame. It was a promotion facilitated not just by the fact Jupiter was approaching the astronomer’s Libran sun but by the fact a fortunate, easy trine of transiting Venus was directing upon the degree of the astronomer’s name, Grant,  itself in Jesus’ horoscope in the house of whatever undermines, as news reached the press on December 2nd. Far from being imprecise, astrology can be all too precise – again, one just couldn’t invent something like Matthews intervention to question Matthew’s gospel).

If, impossibly, the case I make in Testament of the Magi could be wholly disproved, the data would need to be the greatest statistical anomaly of all time to present  quite so much descriptive accuracy against chance.

BUT WHAT ABOUT A COMET?

The question one may nonetheless still ask is: could something else, connected to or additional to the certifiable factors of the birth pattern be involved?

I never particularly wished to associate a comet with Christ’s birth because his birth is “good tidings of great joy” and by tradition comets have always been deemed unfortunate. Colin Nicholl’s The Great Christ Comet, nonetheless argues that the association of comets with misfortune is not an exceptionless universal rule. Since I anyway seek to take the tragedy of Jesus’ earthly life into account (as with Saturn modifying Jupiter) I must accept the possibility a comet could relate to and amplify the picture and I now think it may have done so. A long tailed comet pointed downward might even account for long held and popular notions of some miraculous, independent, brilliant “star” that “stood over the place”. (The early church father Origen did go so far as to suppose a comet).  But “standing over the place” is of course something no comet (or planet) would ever exactly do, though it is how writing and writers of the times would describe things – Josephus had a comet “standing over Jerusalem” before its fall in 70 AD and I think we can assume the Jewish Matthew’s literary style would particularly incline him to make any star or comet something like Israel’s pillar of fire to go before the people.

Apart from the fact the plain sense reading of Matthew’s text has always been taken to support the idea of a star (aster) rather than the kometes word it doesn’t use, one problem with a comet as opposed a star “pointing” anywhere, is if it was very noticeable wouldn’t Herod’s court already have seen it? It would be much easier for Herod to be ignorant of the motions and specialized astrological implications of planetary configurations. That’s why he consults with the Magi rather than just steps outside to gaze at the heavens.  So if it was involved in events, a comet would surely not need to be at its greatest magnitude,  brightest and nearest earth as Nicholl wants to have it. The latter occurred in 6 BC, not 7 BC and it’s by assuming a 6 BC over against a 7 BC birth that I feel Nicholl weakens such case as he has. But I return to this presently.

MOTIONS OF THE ALLEGED COMET

The real problem with Nicholl’s comet which he even proposes may have been the greatest and brightest in history is, did it truly exist? Ironically this is never made perfectly clear amid the often complex data of his academic study, the interviews and reviews (readers who bought into hype about the book’s racy narrative might wonder given the technicalities and learned notes!). All I can say is that even though like most comets, especially the long period ones, it isn’t found in historical records,the comet could still have existed and apparently the Armagh Observatory seems prepared to credit its existence and has “reconstructed” it.

I can’t possibly assess this and I think Nicholl and Armagh need to explain more, plus I do wish that Nicholl, who imagines a Jupiter/Saturnconjunction of 7 BC could have accompanied and  alerted the Magi to the growing comet, would observe some basics of symbolic grammar and logic – it’s inadmissible to think of Jupiter as symbol of “God most high” and in relation to it Saturn as Israel. Jupiter is the younger over against  the Saturnian person or thing that’s elder in time, a son figure as against a patriarchal Saturn, Rome’s Dei Filius, son of God. Regardless……what I can state is that since one can now read what is not supplied in Nicholl’s study, namely the GCC’s supposed motions across centuries according to Swiss Astrodienst, then perhaps the comet was real. If so and I am not then dealing with the few allowable flukes and coincidences that could attend any wide ranging thesis, there does look to be something potentially significant in those motions.

On the day and time I claim Jesus was born, the GCC at 21 Aquarius was conjunct Jesus’ 20 degree all-important Aquarian destiny and reputation Midheaven (itself conjuncted among other things by his Joshua/Jesus name) plus mysteriously too and as though symbolizing some kind of life fulfilment, the GCC was on the precise degree of the Bethlehem Star on the day and time in 30 AD that, in possibly the most remarkable chapter of my book, I show that Christ would have to departed this world. But there’s not only this.

Early December 7 BC is one of the times Nicholl singles out for meaningful but not maximum visibility of his comet. Following David Hughes in assuming that the Magi arrived in Jerusalem in early December around the time of the third Jupiter/Saturn conjunction, (which is to say after Jesus’ actual birth as the gospel implies), I naturally look to see what the GCC is doing around December 5th.

Strangely enough, it is at 14 Aquarius. In my book I point out this could be the most crucial, sensitive degree for the Magi since it’s Jesus’ degree of asteroid Chaldaea (and even on an axis with DavidHughes at 14 Leo who has helped return to us the Chaldaean secrets). Fascinatingly, at the time of the third and last era conjunction on 5th December 7 BC, the transiting sun in Sagittarius (sign of any foreigners and philosophies) was in favourable aspect to Jesus’ 14 degree Chaldaea at the same time as Saturn (the authorities, restriction) afflicted it. Is this celestial shorthand for hopeful Magi arriving and finding trouble and then needing an extra sign? It could be. It’s at least suggestive.

THE GREAT SIGN OF THE WOMAN IN VIRGO

Perhaps because it’s harder to imagine Middle Eastern Magi (who it’s accepted were aware of the special phenomena of 7 BC) being able to predict from and follow a comet rather than the planets, Nicholl wants and needs to associate Christ’s birth with extremely visible, obvious, minimally or non-astrological phenomena in the heavens specifically associated with the constellation Virgo and in especially 6 BC. But to do this he has to assume that Revelation 12’s vision of the birth of a man child is describing the patterns of Jesus’ gestation in the womb and birth itself against the background of the stars. Yet this same apocalyptic vision with its portent in the heavens is supposed to be prophetic, not historic. (I briefly consider this same vision, currently of interest in some circles due to what will be a rare highlighting of the constellation Virgo in 2017, in a recent article The Astronomy and Astrology of Apocalypse: Could there be such? http://wp.me/p2v96G-OA )

Whatever the truth about a comet and the Rev 12 vision, plainly the vision can never, I think, be made to time Christ’s  birth or even just generally accompany it…..unless as regards a paralleling one could factor in one or two other ideas beyond present scope but that concern the prophet Micah’s prophecy of the Messiah in chapters 4 and 5 whose implications Nicholl ignores. This could allow both some kind of delay factor and duplication in the nature of what is seen as being birthed which is not the Messiah only.

Given this modification one could allow that the birth of Christ might still have a connection of sorts to the celestial signs of the Rev 12 pattern……but more as a sign of a whole messianic season than as guide to the precise birth day of the Messiah. This concession would also allow, as I think it should, that the supposed lesser light of the comet in 7 BC at the time of the last Jupiter/Saturn conjunction, can still be relevant. Whatever the comet might subsequently and however spectacularly do, is then seen as part of a more  general visionary picture, even celestial celebration of the incoming era – why, after all,  should only one day alone describe and celebrate a nativity and whole era with all the changes it bring right through to its ending regarding which the pattern might also supply clues.

We are presently at the end of the same era (the Piscean, age of grace, era) the Magi helped signal. I even believe that is why it is now possible for us finally to know the details of what it was the Magi knew and more than they knew. The information is at once historic and prophetic……One could even make poetry out of it….I have done this (adding some extraordinary facts in prose) on the blog The Magi at Era’s End: A Poem http://wp.me/p2v96G-ip

testament1Available in book (and Kindle) from Amazon  goo.gl/I28aCm  and from The Book Depository (UK)

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 13, 2016 in astrology, Mysteries, religion

 

Tags: , , , , ,

AN ASTRONOMY/ASTROLOGY OF APOCALYPSE: COULD THERE BE SUCH?

apocalypse1

ENDINGS AND THE ONE CERTAIN FACT

Nowadays when some sectors of the church are taken up with the subject of end-times and there is an abundance of often fanciful You Tube dreams of alleged apocalyptic relevance, it’s ironic that ignored or dismissed is one of the more solid grounds for declarations about our  times as one of endings.

If there was nothing more to derive from the heavens than one indisputable fact (but I will be considering whether there might be more), there is this. An astronomical/astrological era lasts approximately two millennia. The world stands at the end of the same era of Pisces (the fishes) that was inaugurated around the time of Christ’s birth about which magi (astrologers) knew something – including doubtless that among other things Pisces is a sign of suffering and the martyr. Now, as though something was coming full circle, it’s especially Christian faith (whose original secret sign under persecution was once the fish) is either declining in its heartlands, being persecuted in regions of its third world growth and/or suffering persecution, sometimes even genocide, in Muslim majority societies. Some of these were the earliest homes of Christianity too. (Only western secular indifference and PC attitudes affecting media and governments obscure quite how widespread and extreme this situation is).

pisces

In era terms we stand at the equivalent of the final degree of the sign, i.e. 29 degrees of Pisces. That degree conjuncts an evil star long been regarded as one of the worst in the heavens. And suitably it’s since a total solar eclipse on that degree in March 2015 (and amid a rare and peculiar sequence of blood moon lunar eclipses begun the previous year), that the world as we know it began seriously and more rapidly to unravel. It has been doing so in ways traditionally associated with the negativity of 29 Pisces – drownings, floods, suicides, murders, theft, deception, despair, the victim, the refugee – in short, just the scenario presented by the cruelty and deceit of ISIS, the chaos of mass migration, the genocide of minorities and the natural disasters that destroy whole communities.

As everything returns to the seas of origin and does so with much of the extremism associated with any last (anaretic) degree of a sign, hope among secularists is pinned on a new globalism and among the more spiritual on some would-be all-inclusive religion. Even the current Pope (himself theoretically the last according to the prophecy of St Malachy) seems to be edging in that direction even while Christians die in ways that recall the first Roman persecutions. Overall there’s little more reigns than last degree, last phase chaos, the confusion and blurring of everything amid which the West’s long standing objective ideals of democracy and free speech are threatened by a weak, confused, largely godless political correctness. And paradoxically, the latter often concedes and almost masochistically, to the most extreme of belief systems and customs that can only undermine its own values. (Negatively Pisces is about  masochism and any indiscriminate charity and toleration!).

But serious though it is, does 29 Pisces really bespeak and anticipate the likes of the biblical Tribulation whose occurrence would finish little short of the end of life as we know it? The non astrological answer can be in the affirmative if the times demonstrated a notable continuation of the problems already observed, especially if, like the pattern of natural disasters in recent years, they increased in frequency and/or intensity. That is what birth pangs do, and the apocalyptic end is said to be heralded by precisely “birth pangs” (Matt 24:8) at the same time as harmonious with the mentioned situation of Christianity worldwide, a distinct decline in faith, a “falling away” also features  (Luk 18:8), (2 Thess 2:3). But beyond such general indicators, is there, could there be any astronomy/astrology of apocalypse?

The answer is a conditional yes and here’s why.

astroages

THE PATTERN OF THE AGES

Despite what some imagine, astrology is empirical. It looks to what has happened before under certain factors to see if these will be repeated. Needless to say, earth, society or climate-related apocalypse has never happened in recorded history, though great wars and disasters have always occurred. So there’s no single factor can serve as example. All the same, some real sea changes in human history and consciousness do occur with the change of eras following the precession of the equinox, or apparently so. It follows one can look at that within the narrow frame of known history as a first point. I’ll summarize about this very briefly before considering how the information might fit in and illuminate other issues of our times.

4000 BC to 2000 BC corresponded to the “feminine” age of Taurus the bull whose character as in the development of Egypt’s state cult with its immortality obsessed pyramids necessarily idealized the afterlife and sex mysteries in line with its opposite sign Scorpio. (The character and activities of an era is given by its sign, but its ideals are drawn from its opposite sign, all signs having a positive or negative potential expression-wise).

Taurus was overtaken around 2000 BC by the “masculine”, more patriarchal age of Mars-ruled Aries the Ram, an era of Lebensraum wars as in the Bible and concluding in extreme blood baths as of the Roman arena. Aries’ ideals lay in the opposite sign, Libra, sign of Laws and marriage. The Old Testament covenant and prophecy are very much about Law and marriage. The ideals of many societies of the period were enshrined in their laws.

Two thousand years ago the “feminine” sign of Pisces, a sign “ruled” by grace-bringing Jupiter and compassionate Neptune opened to more female values like forgiveness, generosity and service; but its ideals, when not focussed on Christ himself (whom there is good reason to believe was born under opposite sign Virgo), inclined ever more to the scientific, analytic and material concerns of this earth sign as in Enlightenment philosophy under whose values at least in the West the era is now ending  and standing on the cusp of the next more individualistic and Utopian Aquarius/Leo age.

The fact that Jesus was born in Bethlehem (house of bread, bread being associated with the wheatsheaf and harvest sign, Virgo), fished with fisherman on Galilee, performed the miracle of loaves and fishes, spoke parables of the great harvest etc, distinctly links him and Christianity to the Pisces-Virgo era.

In effect Jesus belongs to the previous age too. He claims to fulfil its Law and becomes the last sacrificed ram/lamb of Aries and the first “fish” or fisherman of Pisces, resurrected like Jonah who emerges from the whale. To the extent Jesus is self-identified in his body with the Temple (Joh 2:19), implicitly and indirectly he may even be said to relate to the remote, earlier Taurus age because the Temple cannot be founded without the ashes of the red heifer, a creature of Taurus.

So, if anything like this astro-historical scheme is accepted, and undeniably the bible’s “dispensations” of Law and Grace do more obviously connect to the succession of the eras than other faiths – Buddhism is over five centuries out and Islam over six centuries -, we can ask another question.  The question is: does the symbolism for the current closing era and then for the succeeding Aquarian era (which biblically would correspond to the  Millennium), betray that these eras are meant to be identified with what is now happening and may soon occur? Does Christ once again straddle the ages and link to the coming Aquarian one? Here are some reasons to think that could be.

STAGES OF RETURN

revelation

Unless many students of prophecy have got it wrong, the Bible appears to divide its end times apocalypse and Second Advent into two parts whose symbolism could be considered striking in context of era symbolism.

Extremely, yet in its way not inconsistently with the extremism of any last degree, there is:

  1. a hidden Return of Christ for the believing prepared (the time when “one shall be taken and the other left” Matt 24:40, often called the Rapture). This effectively delivers persons from the very last trials of the age, namely a Tribulation period under an Antichrist figure.
  2. There is also: an open return of the Messiah to the world that ends the seven year rule of the Antichrist figure and inaugurates the ideal Messianic kingdom.

The first of these endings is evoked and anticipated in Jesus’ apocalyptic parables. These speak in terms of harvest, of prepared virgins/ bridesmaids and the need not to be drunk with the servants etc and so are redolent of key symbols of Pisces and Virgo (both are servant signs and Pisces is often inebriate) and  the whole picture overshadowed by what seems like a sudden great disappearance. Significantly, any state of absence, invisibility and disappearance is associated with Pisces and its ruler Neptune. That would cover for the end of an era in an extreme of its nature.

The second of these scenarios is about almost the opposite, namely a very visible event, sudden and surprising (the other event was that also but under cover of invisibility). This event is compared to lightning going from one end of heaven to the other (Matt 24:27). The image is harmonious with the lightning glyph of Aquarius, a sign ruled by Uranus, planet of the sudden and surprising and the very opposite of hidden. So this bespeaks a sudden and absolute irruption of the new era.

The biblical Millennium is effectively a Utopia, a concept beloved of Aquarians (the word and concept was invented by an Aquarian, Thomas Moore).

What is almost the biblical clincher for the assumption that the age to follow any Piscean breakdown is the Aquarian age and that consequently apocalypse is not to be seen as  in some far distant future or never, is this…..

Whether Ezekiel’s prophecy of the end times, millennial temple is more a symbolic vision of various realities or the forecast of a literal temple, either way the fact is its walls are decorated with figures of cherubim who have two faces, one a man, one a lion (Ex 41:18-19).

This has to be the archetypal man of Aquarius with its opposite ideal-supplying sign, Leo, the sign of the lion and royalty. And as Christ is “the Lion of the tribe of Judah” and in specifically the apocalyptic book of Revelation (Rev 5:5) in which he comes to claim his kingdom, once again the messianic connection fits.

THE ALBERT SCHWEITZER MISTAKE

schweitzer

One other piece of symbolism from a parable of Jesus would support ideas that the present Pisces to Aquarius era cross-over could be indicated for apocalyptic events.

There is a theory, popularized by the notable Albert Schweitzer in his The Quest of the Historical Jesus (1906), that Jesus was a failed apocalyptic prophet who wrongly foresaw the end time as happening soon and for his own generation “this generation will not pass away…..(Luk 21:32). One point used to support this hypothesis if anything denies it.

Given various biblical references, the fig tree of the parable is reasonably enough often believed to be Israel, its people and nation. It is when it sprouts forth new buds there will be a generation who sees the apocalypse. Israel at the time of Jesus was not a united people, not a nation, but a divided colony. Israel would not be reconstituted as a people and a nation until modern times.

A biblical generation can be 120 years, 70 years, 40 years or even the 50 years of a Jubilee. The fact remains however that Israel is currently 68 years old from its modern foundation in 1948 (following a UN vote for its existence in 1947). At that rate one could argue, and many now do, that an apocalyptic scenario should begin soon….which if so would obviously associate it with end of Piscean era events.

THE ENIGMA OF THE ALLEGED GREAT SIGN OF 2017

sept23

The following is a peculiar, increasingly emphasized apocalyptic speculation. It does not originate with me and I have serious questions about it, but it is appropriate to comment on it here given its unusually astronomical/astrological nature by the standards of those who normally exclude such an emphasis from their prophetic speculations…..

Pointing to a possible apocalyptic scenario and even rather soon, is what some perceive as an unusual astronomical sign of the northern autumn of 2017. It falls just after Israel’s two day Feast of Trumpets (falling specifically on the autumn solstice 0 Libra which means a world point in astrology) and in relation to the constellation of Virgo. Some believe the rare pattern constituted corresponds to the “great sign” (portent) in the heavens of Revelation 12. Whether it does or not, biblically the sign has always invited serious examination. The bible talks about “signs” but not a “great sign” or “portent” in this way that seeks almost to draw attention to itself. And if the skies of 2017 do hold what Revelation might anciently have been referring to, then that pattern would undeniably be a rarity not seen in thousands of years.

Even if the right factors are being correctly observed and there is thus some apocalyptic significance, obviously it could still be a general one rather than the time indicator of one event.  And  it’s a crucial question, one embarrassing even to those convinced of a portent but who don’t wish to be mere date setters, whether the sign is timing a specific event like the Rapture and/or the onset of the Tribulation( whose timing it was long thought we weren’t meant to know) or just pointing to imminence more generally.

Before proceeding to the sign astronomically, it is necessary to consider its symbolism and why the scenario of Revelation 12, often associated in especially Catholicism with the Church and Marian doctrine, is getting associated today with a more Protestant doctrine of end-times.. The modern take on the sign is logical enough.

THE WOMAN AND THE THREATENED CHILD

The given scenario is one in which a crowned woman (clothed with the sun and with the moon under her feet and twelve stars at her head) gives birth to a man child who will rule the world but who is snatched to heaven away from a seven headed, ten horned dragon. The frustrated dragon seeks to devour the woman who flees into the wilderness where she will be preserved for a period half that of the seven year, world-destroying Tribulation.

Tradition has to be wrong about this vision. It is not and cannot be about the lives of Jesus and the Virgin. Jesus is understood to have ascended to heaven triumphantly having conquered evil. He is not described as snatched to heaven to avoid the forces of evil. Mary moreover is widely believed to have ended her days in Ephesus; she did not have to flee anywhere actually or symbolically, certainly not to any desert.

The snatching away however is the same harpazo verb St Paul applies in his epistles to the Rapture/transformation of prepared believers at the Last Trump. The woman ought therefore to be Israel or the Virgin daughter, Jerusalem who (within John the Revelator’s lifetime has just given birth to the new and persecuted messianic faith (the first Christians were Jews) even if not all Israel accepts it and will accordingly experience the end of the era differently from those of the faith. She will not herself be snatched away but she will be protected during the time of increasing troubles on earth the Tribulation..

Granted the woman’s “man child” who will subdue the nations sounds as though it could be Christ to the extent this looks to a stated future role of the Messiah (Ps 2: 4-7, Rev 2:27 etc). But since it was early Christian doctrine that believers must share in the rule of Christ over the future kingdom, the man child is better seen as a reflection of Christ, or even his “body”, finally unified with him in the Rapture/resurrection of the Last Trump. Elsewhere the church is the bride, but as with all symbolism there is a certain fluidity. It is not the church’s devotional relationship to Christ but its role more politically that seem to be hinted at. (Personally I believe the man child could be the symbolic equivalent of the Puer  or boy/youth archetype functioning here as an alternative symbol to the Bride because the Puer archetype has considerable association with flight and Gaymede type myth of being seized to precisely heaven). It is because of this resurrection/transformation that any kind of contribution to organizing the next era in the wake of  Tribulation’s apocalyptic disasters is possible for anyone in addition to Christ.(Rev 20:4).

So…is the “great sign” in Virgo something to do with the cut-off event of a Rapture and an end of the age whose absolutely last brief phase is the period of historically unparalleled Tribulation? The main events of Jesus’ known earthly life and the church’s foundation corresponded to or ”fulfilled” the spring to summer festivals of the Jewish calendar. Any future events involving Jesus ought to engage the autumn festivals of which the Feast of Trumpets would be one, indeed the first in sequence.

While as said I don’t consider the 2017 sign, if relevant, need absolutely time or introduce the season of  Rapture/ Tribulation, if one cares to suppose that it does then wouldn’t that anyway just be more of that tired and tiresome “date setting” that flies in the face of all gospel talk like that of Matt 25:15 about not knowing the day nor the hour etc?

trumpets

AN ADVENT MYSTERY HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT?

,,,,,The surprising, at first sight heretical answer is “not necessarily”  because it seems something very important may have got hidden in plain sight, is encoded and marks something we could usefully be aware of. More than not knowing the day nor the hour, what most of us didn’t know was the Jewish custom and expression that was second nature for Jesus in speaking of apocalypse.

It now looks as though Jesus projected the whole apocalyptic theme upon the cosmos. The Feast of Trumpets was traditionally associated with marriage and the marriage of the Messiah (the Christian “Marriage of the Lamb”). Marriages lasted seven days (and note the “Marriage of the Lamb” occurs during the seven years of end-of-era Tribulation), and the Feast of Trumpets which was the New Year and beginnings festival in the northern autumn, was traditionally a favourite time for unions. The festival lasted across two days from a new moon agreed upon by rabbis who had actually witnessed it with their eyes. It was also customarily never certain when the bridegroom would leave his father’s house for the house of his bride’s parents. Only the father would know  as per Matt 24:36. 

The message appears to be that events like the Rapture and/or the onset of Tribulation could only be associated in any era or year with the new beginnings of the annual Feast of Trumpets. Since the Feast lasts more than a day and, as said, the Father alone knows when the Bridegroom departs for the bride, it’s true that no one could ever exactly know which day or time marriage would take place. But one could know it generally, and St Paul possibly hints (1 Cor 15:52) that its time (somewhere or anywhere in the world but most likely Jerusalem) would be around sundown because “in the twinkling of an eye” can mean that as opposed to just suddenly. The Last trump of many blasts at the festival should be at sundown.

So…supposing the sign in the heavens which perfects on the 23rd of September 2017 (just after the Feast which is slated to fall in 2017 across the 21st and 22nd) is timing, or is forecasting as imminent, or recapitulating as just having occurred, a major event of that season? It’s possible. And if so that could parallel the first advent of Christ which prophetically has a dimension of suddenness and surprise (“and the Lord whom you seek will suddenly come to his temple” Mal 3:1) at the same time as (helped by the book of Daniel) the when of advent was approximately known in Israel which was rife with messianic expectation in Jesus’ lifetime. But now we have to look at the 2017 event itself astronomically and here there are problems some fail to see or acknowledge..

A SIGN TROPICAL AND SIDEREAL

The alleged phenomenon of 2017 involves how one regards a highlighting of the Virgo region of the heavens. There is a constellation of Virgo the Virgin.  Below and adjoining her are the constellations of Hydra and Drago – the latter two almost certainly have some bearing on Revelation’s image of the seven headed dragon pursuing the pregnant woman, while above Virgo is the regal constellation of Leo.  With its nine stars, although it’s a separate constellation, Leo can if one likes be seen as a kind of crown to Virgo, or becoming such when very exceptionally three transiting planets (not stars) make the pattern up to twelve. But why should anyone assume this against customary understanding?

More traditionally the star cluster of 12 stars, Coma Berenices (Berenice’s lock), is itself seen as a sort of twelve starred crown to Virgo  not the stars of Leo plus some rare transits. Virgo with Coma  Berenices with its twelve stars is almost certainly what the Revelator was referring to. This is a serious problem one can have with the 2017 speculation.  Another is that every year in northern autumn the sun will be at the head and descend over the constellation Virgo radiating or clothing it and the moon will pass at her feet. In 2017 however, those who think that Leo’s stars should constitute Virgo’s crown, and planetary  transits make up the requisite 12 stars to “crown” the woman, will also stress that the likewise cyclical (but once every 11/12 year) movement of Jupiter,the king and messianic planet, have been in Virgo from November 2016 into September 2017 signalling pregnancy, emerging between the woman’s legs marking a suitable gestation period there.

But again this is to take liberties. There is not the precise nine months some non astronomers and non astrologers imagine because the forward and apparent retrograde motions of Jupiter take it outside the confines of the womb area during the total transit period which is more like ten months.  (This is an objection visually demonstrated by religion writer, Joel Richardson, in his You Tube  at  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8qn6rvvQNw  which all those pushing the 23rd September sign should absorb). Further confusion is occasioned by the fact that many would say Jupiter was anyway in Libra rather than Virgo in 2017 though this touches on a technicality of measurements. There are two forms of astrological and astronomical measurement: the tropical which measures all signs from 0 Aries in any given year, and the sidereal astrology little used today outside India, which calculates from what is seen against the backdrop of the constellations. In tropical astrology the signs, called after the zodiacal constellations, are measured in 30 degree sectors from O Aries in the northern spring when the sun crosses the ecliptic. The vernal point is what moves very slowly backwards across time against the literal constellations. It is this movement marks the change of eras as described above. As it happens, if one disregards the visual zodiac entirely, there is enough of potential significance for the relevant period employing the tropical system.

I have long wondered, and long before any theories of the alleged special sign of Sept 23rd,  about the possible significance of the latter part of 2017, I have done so since among other things I claim to possess the correct, still working data for the Pentecost AD 30 foundation of the church. Within its pattern I have for example always considered factors such as  the late Libra degrees important as reflecting certain early Christian notions of endings and apocalypse. (End-times issues often crop up significantly with the area around 26 Libra. The egregious Harold Camping who poured millions into advertising a false Rapture date, was born with his natal sun in negative square to 26 Libra). This and other factors stand to be affected.

Then too, latter half 2017 has religious significance in its own right without any crowning from Leo. The mere fact that Uranus and Jupiter aspect the Galactic Centre  in September/October and Saturn in November conjuncts it, arguably points to something. The GCentre is at 26 Sagittarius, itself the sign of organized religions and the GC is associated with various upheavals and events in religion (might Saturn there herald a period of restriction or tribulation?). There is besides the matter of the Antichrist. If that person exists and corresponds to the individual the late Jeane Dixon saw birthed in 1962 in the vision she considered the point of her life and such gifts as she had, then that person with their exceptional birth pattern must appear late 2017 or early 2018. No chance would ever again occur during their lifetime to put world power and influence into their hands. And to at any rate many students of the prophetic, the Antichrist can only appear post Rapture. And then, under any system one applies, on Sept 23rd it happens that the moon will be conjunct comet C67 and by tradition comets are not bearers of good news, rather they warn the world.

. So, mystery and questions remain even if we dismiss the alleged Sept 23rd sign which anyway doesn’t fall across what theoretically ought to be the more sensitive period of Trumpets.

THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY BUT EVEN SO…

Horoscope

Even if you doubt that specifically 2017 and its sign heralds the extraordinary and question if we are quite at the end of an era (despite widespread feeling amid already high stress levels that we surely are), the fact remains that if life is unusually and violently disturbed that situation is not about to improve. From early 2018 the world will begin to feel renewed effects of the historically wars and disasters associated Saturn/Pluto cycle which oversaw WW 1 and 2. It may well oversee WW 111 before decade’s end, even if that doesn’t correspond to the wars of the Antichrist as such. But trouble there will be so that forewarned is forearmed.

Anyone could be more and better forearmed given awareness of matters that inside and outside the churches aren’t known or taught because of a narrow intellectual and spiritual legacy. This is one that despite the Magi at Christ’s birth denies anything can be known via the heavens and astrology (the latter simply the symbolic interpretation of what astronomical data reveal).

If only to avoid embarrassing errors, it is high time the churches became more acquainted with astrology. They should do so not just because from the Magi it is a key to elements of the faith and is not the biblically forbidden “divination” some make it out to be – the Talmud and the Essenes would never had used it if such were the case – but to avoid the exaggerated claims that pass for Christian “prophecy” when celestial signs get treated without context or background.

A chronic example has been the fuss about the red moons. I believe they represent something but only within a larger picture and they could never hope to be sufficiently appreciated without some knowledge of astrology. Indeed, one of the reasons I am prepared to listen to claims re the sign of 2017 is because it’s preceded by what look to be significant eclipses both in their own right and as they connect to certain patterns like that for Christianity’s foundational Pentecost. Also it’s desirable and normal for world shaking events to find some planet or descriptive asteroid on one of the six world points and I find something of that too. One can’t like Biltz, Hagee etc just draw attention to a red moon, declare it a sign and start forecasting. It’s not what the Magi did and it’s not what the astrologer should do today (though some might say almost anything for sensation!). The astrologically illiterate Biltz, Hagee line is little short of the omen astrology (looking at the heavens and uttering as opposed to the study of connecting cycles, degree patterns and symbols) that biblical prophets condemned.

TOWARDS AN ASTRO-THEOLOGY

Some basic knowledge of astrology, indeed the language of astro-theology, would be enlightening and make it harder for certifiably failed prophets like Jonathan Cahn to make sensational forecasts of doom for dates which don’t show the kind of negative potential alleged. The irony however is that the likes of Cahn will still be published, still invited to Christian media channels despite repeated errors, something the bible allows to no self-declared prophet, while by long tradition the astrologer remains the persona non grata, the unbiblical heretic, even the black magician (the early church father, Origen, called the Magi devil worshippers and Bishop St John Chrysostom thought astrology was so evil it would have been better if they had never come to Christ’s birth. Clearly there’s a problem here!)

Escaping Herod, the Magi disappear into the night carrying their secrets with them. At the end of the age their mission heralded, can we finally know what they knew and more that we should know today? I strongly maintain so and because, as T.S.Eliot has it in Little Gidding :

We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive at where we started
And know the place for the first time.

With the facts, data, interpretations and revelations of Testament of The Magi: Mysteries of the Birth and Life of Christ (none of it so far of any interest to secular media which is ever less Christian and ever more anti Christian), you can go back to Christ’s origins  and then from there through to the present in ways never before experienced. And perhaps, like the wise bridesmaids of the parable, you can more easily keep the lights burning, ready for anything.

img_20161013_0002_new

A BOOK: TESTAMENT OF THE MAGI

With this book the mysteries of Magi, the Bethlehem Star and much more are certifiably solved. The data, still working for Jesus issues and events to this day, is fingerprint exact down to the last descriptive asteroid and Part.  The book radically develops a theory about Christ’s birth first proposed in the 70s by a notable Austrian astronomer Ferrari D’Occhieppo and enlarged upon in some aspects by the British astrophysicist, David Hughes. In his The Infancy Narratives (2012) Pope Benedict cited the D’Occhieppo thesis which he thought plausible but wondered what we should make of it. What indeed when the theory was still incomplete?

This book completes the edifice to a point it could not now be improved upon or seriously rivalled….. A big claim but that is almost the problem. Many may  prefer to ignore the evidence simply because it is so impossible to dismiss; and of course within religion let along the secular world, there is a huge prejudice against “astrology” to the point it is almost impossible to be heard. But here is a picture that defies statistical probability, one it that couldn’t be invented. No previous theories work or not sufficiently across the range of issues that must always be addressed in advancing any claim to have discovered the holy grail of all stargazing. Arguably this book belongs to the times discussed in the article above. Secrets of the beginning of the era can perhaps only be disclosed at that same era’s end.

Testament of the Magi is available in book and kindle form at Amazon   goo.gl/I28aCm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 3, 2016 in astrology, Mysteries, religion

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

THERE’S NO ALEISTER CROWLEY “LITE”

peaches    crowley

A LEGACY THAT HAUNTS

It is an unpalatable thought, hopefully not true but plausible, that when in 2014 Peaches Geldof tragically died of an overdose of heroin, she could be considered the latest victim to the ongoing influence of Aleister Crowley (1875 -1947), once dubbed “the wickedest man in the world”.

All said and done, there is a trail of persons who have gone mad, finished alcoholic, drug addicted or suicidal in the wake of falling under the sway of this person who taught that “God” could be worshipped including through drugs – which I don’t suggest Peaches was doing. She was trying to escape addiction and had even apparently succeeded a few months prior, but if an addictive weakness was in her, certainly the example and teaching (including that “death is the crown of all”) of the himself heroin addicted Crowley, would scarcely have helped.

And Peaches’ family had been disturbed by the interest that she had developed in this dangerous magus or Satanist whom she told her thousands of Facebook followers was a fascinating person they should study and who wasn’t a Satanist really. Peaches herself was serious enough about Crowley to have had OTO tattooed on her underarm (initials of a sex magic organization associated with Crowley and to which she at one time belonged).

Doubtless Crowley was not the most wicked man in the world the press once said he was if he is judged by the standards of Hitler, Ghengis Khan or Kim Jong-un. But there might still be grounds to regard Crowley as one of the most spiritually evil of persons. Obsessed with apocalyptic themes and imagery from his strange but very wealthy Plymouth Brethren upbringing, Crowley aspired to be the Therion, the Beast, or the Antichrist. He was determined to sin and discover what was the unforgivable sin and commit it.

Crowley might as far as possible be said to have done the latter in especially the course of a blasphemous ritual performed in the desert of North Africa in 1909. There he “sacrificed himself” and invoked the spirit of the depths, Choronzon (traditionally seen as a Devil figure), asking to be possessed by him wholly and by – dangerously in standard magical terms – standing outside the magic circle on the triangle of invocation. The effect of the possession included amid its kaleidoscope of visions experience of thirst and a torment that had Crowley screaming “My God my God why have you forsaken me”. One can of course maintain that Crowley was influenced by biblical sources here, but it is true that a tormented spirit would quite likely be thirst ridden like Dives in Hades in the parable of Luke 16 and realize total separation from God, the ground of Being and the root of the Good. This is what hell is most essentially understood to be and is what Christ is believed to have experienced on the cross.

crowley2

Crowley did not, strictly speaking, believe in and acknowledge either God or Satan, so up to a point Peaches was correct to maintain Crowley was not a Satanist. But he scarcely denied it and certainly didn’t mind if people thought he was. He believed in a universal energy and spirits and his “holy guardian angel” that he spared no pains to contact from the outset. Though when he finally appeared this guardian was called Aiwass, he was identified by Crowley as Lucifer in so many words. In effect Aiwass needed to be Lucifer or like him since Crowley was opposed to anything remotely like the God those around him believed in and from which he and they supposedly needed to be delivered. The Book of the Law dictated to Crowley in Egypt by Aiwass in 1904 contains, amid much that seems unintelligible (and which is not even supposed to suffer exposition though inevitably it has done), the dictum most associated with Crowley: “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Love is the Law, love under will”.

The essential meaning is or could be an almost a Jungian one. The person must do what the deep Self demands not what society expects or habit inclines to. And to that extent the saying makes some psychological sense though for Crowley and his followers it seemed to be a pretext for licence in the most damaging of ways. Crowley, himself bisexual and sado-masochistic with it, believed one could and should engage in even the most revolting or violent of experiences and sexual acts, transcending every form of disgust so long as experience was “intense”. Whether Crowley ever did dispose of anyone -it’s a disputed point – he did maintain the highest ritual was the sacrifice of a virgin whose dismembered corpse would be divided up for sacrifice to appropriate gods.

FROM BLACK MAGICIAN TO NEW AGE GURU

If you can manage to separate the man from his profoundly disturbing biography which includes cruel treatment and betrayal of even lovers, helpers and animals, it is possible – just – to arrive at a picture of an individual who amid his unique and highly organized system of magic, authors a sort of philosophy. It’s theory in the style of sometimes Nietzsche, sometimes Jung, a protest against inhibitions with a doctrine of archetypal style forces. It is also almost possible to present Crowley as a kind of New Age guru who generalizes and unifies the religions and mystical systems of the world.

crowley3

In the last couple of decades or so, something like this has been taking place. A new Crowley scholarship has arisen which seeks to rehabilitate him as a thinker who, socially, was little more than just an extravagant trickster figure, prankster or actor. Though it’s good and even necessary to have the facts about Crowley, I suggest academe’s makeover is misguided and dangerous. At the same time one recognizes too that it’s almost inevitable due to the all but respectable status Crowley enjoys in influential alternative and rock cultures. A good summary of this is provided in the final chapter of Gary Lachman’s 2014 biography of Crowley. John Lennon, Timothy Leary, Led Zeppelin, David Bowie, Ozzy Osbourne, Iron Maiden, Jim Morrison, Kenneth Anger, the list is a long one for the influence of Crowley, however diluted and “lite”, from the hard core version of the life and practices.

But because rock culture is so all-pervasive, society and belief have anyway become a bit Crowleyized. Frank Turek, author of Stealing From God,[1] has interestingly and meaningfully suggested that at any rate American atheism has almost more to do with sex than unbelief. The new unnamed religion is one of “erotic revolt” of sex and personal rights and, I would add, one in which the quest for truth is reduced to deciding (if one is at all religious) that all systems of religion, mysticism and magic must amount to the same thing anyway. This adjustment becomes easier to make when religious experience becomes identified and over-identified with the effects of the orgasm anyone can experience.

Crowley forecast that sex would be the downfall of Christianity and it must be admitted against a too easy acceptance of Turek’s position, that this is somewhat true and Christianity does have some responsibility for what has happened in making deity seem unattractively enemy of all eros. It is not simply that the faith has been unnecessarily narrow and oppressive in its approach to some subjects like homosexuality, but it has ignored or suppressed the more esoteric and “tantric” aspects of the Judaeo-Christian heritage present since the Song of Solomon. (Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, has in recent times been exploring this in works like Kosher Lust and The Kosher Sutra. I have myself written Solomon’s Tantric Song [2]. There are things to examine and reclaim).

However, even if there have been sone failures, they don’t need and can hardly afford Crowley’s radical cures. Yet as indicated, a lot of modern western spirituality New Age and other, by osmosis and default is increasingly a diluted version of Crowlianity. His age of Horus, the crowned child –  the puer archetype at its most anarchic one might say and Lachman more or less does say – is where a lot of the West is now arrived at.

Another Crowley dictum is, “Let there be no difference made…..between any one thing and any other thing”. Despite Crowley’s often fascist, aristocratic individualism, this is an idea that belongs to modern sex rights based less on what is appropriate than what makes merely equal; and a consequence of that emphasis is the increased difficulty of, or just refusal to allow for, a hierarchy of values and thus to perceive any real distinction between good and evil, beautiful and ugly, liberating and merely addictive. Queer theory for example ditches the ethical question entirely, any ethics being purely collective and political rather than personal.

In theological terms Crowley is not really about “sin” but more like the “iniquity” associated with idolatry – in Crowley’s case involving a worship of self that never really seeing beyond itself cannot repent of its wrong within the larger framework of existence. Again modern attitudes and slogans (like post Christian feminist Mary Daly’s “Sin Big”) which don’t believe in saying sorry to anyone for anything, belong with a measure of Crowleyanity. (I have written of Mary Daly, another out of control Libran, as something of a milder, female version of Crowlianity) [3]

THE BIRTH PATTERN THAT TELLS TRUE

crowleychart

All this is mainly by way of an introduction to examination of those features of Crowley’s birth chart which I believe show him to be the real thing, the kind of seriously dangerous person and false prophet he was originally and more correctly perceived as being.

In astrology the sixth house of a birth chart represents anything to do with sacrifices and magic rituals. Suitably Crowley’s Mars, ruler of his Aries Midheaven of career and reputation, is in this relevant sixth house. With the Part of Occultism also in this sector, what he called Magick (his term for sexual magic) would be his career; but it would also be a lie. Veritas (Truth) and Devience (Deviance) are conjunct in opposition to Mars.

The fact that Crowley anyway shows an afflicted Jupiter (register of truth) through an opposition to Neptune, itself describes either a liar or at least someone who has difficulty with getting truth and the facts right. An afflicted Neptune is anyway virtually standard for any addictive tendencies, so Crowley (like Peaches Geldof) had it, in his case and because Jupiter is involved the addiction could be extravagant and philosophically justified, while afflicted Neptune’s lack of boundaries invites to and often accompanies bisexuality. It would however especially do so in Libra where boundaries between I and Thou are anyway at their weakest. Crowley’s Jupiter, itself at 7of the sex sign Scorpio, makes close exact easy trine to a 7 Cancer Hekate, the witchcraft and magic asteroid in the hidden unconscious twelfth house, the clearest of indicators for Crowley’s Magick as sex magic.

To all intents and purposes Crowley was a Satanist. Suitably, Lucifer falls in his ninth house of religion and philosophy on the super wretched chaos degree of 29 Pisces on an axis with Samadhi at 29 Virgo (theoretically highest bliss for yoga but deemed a confusion prone asteroid by astrologers). This pair in turn make tension square (90 degree angle) to a conjunction of Rabelais with Lie. It is with Renaissance writer Rabelais’ Temple of Thelema and its “Do what you will” that Crowley’s doctrine has affinity.

But perhaps most significantly, Crowley’s Venus at 24 Libra, the sign ruled by Venus, is in direct square to Theotes (Godhead) at 24 Capricorn. Crowley is of course very against Jesus, this again reflected in the tense square between Isa (Ar Jesus) at 12 Pisces to Malin at 12 Sagittarius, the devil as darkness rather than Luciferian light. This still isn’t all. The truly awful asteroid Vipera at 18 of Sagittarius (the religions and philosophies sign) conjuncts Drago (Dragon with its suggestion of the book of Revelation) conjunct the Part of Faith and Religion in square to asteroid Spirit at 17 Virgo. It’s a combination which might even be involved with the desire to commit the unforgivable sin.

Born under Libra, sign of Laws, it was in Egypt that Crowley received his Book of the Law. Significantly Aigyptos is same degree conjunct Malus (bad) on 1 Capricorn and from there in easy trine to Achristou which seems to function as the Antichrist asteroid. Crowley was himself initially shocked by some of his book’s declarations and for long tried to ignore them.

The book nonetheless proclaimed him prophet of the Age of Horus, the crowned child. Fascinatingly, asteroid Horus at 9 of royal Leo conjuncts Crowley’s rising 8 degrees of Leo and Horus is trined by Childe from 11 Aries in the house of religion.

Conjunctions are very pro or con something and the accuracy of the chart is certified by the way that asteroid Yeates (asteroids follow a sound sense vibe and hence this is Yeats) conjuncts the 16 Aries Midheaven to the degree. The poet Yeats was opposed to Crowley and their notorious argument caused The Society of the Golden Dawn through which Crowley had first learned and risen in magic to be closed down.

Although Libra is the sign of marriages and unions, Crowley’s relating was particularly dreadful. He sought whores of Babylon as partners and they were liable to be used and abused, a situation reflected in Babylon at 25 Aries opposite his natal Venus. His relating otherwise is reflected in a coldly independent Saturn in Aquarius in the seventh of unions where it conjuncts the Part of Treachery, well reflecting the incredible ruthlessness towards partners and supporters.

I mentioned the rite Crowley undertook in North Africa. This occurred December 6th 1909. There is as Lachman says, no causal connection (and not a notable astrological one that I see unless of the transiting sun conjunct Crowley’s Malin) between that and December 6th 1969. The latter date is however when a Hell’s Angel murdered a youth at a concert of the Rolling Stones at Altamont in California. It occurred at a time when the Stones had been familiarizing themselves with magic under Crowley devotee, film director Kenneth Anger. After that they were not so keen and Sympathy for the Devil was less heard and sung.

That event, the death of Peaches and so much more could be taken as a warning not to mess with the occult and not to elevate Crowley into some kind of deeply knowing spiritual guide nor to dismiss him as just an interesting trickster, an English eccentric, in the way that too often happens today. Both approaches are wrong.

1) http://www.christianpost.com/news/americas-fall-away-from-god-more-about-sex-than-unbelief-christian-author-frank-turek-says-170860/

2) Solomon’s Tantric Song, goo.gl/sU21My

3) See. Temple Mysteries and Spiritual Efficiency, Chapter 8. Mary Daly’s Occult Voyage goo.gl/Xi1jv8

 

 

 
1 Comment

Posted by on October 20, 2016 in Mysteries, religion

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

IS THE PATRICK PROPHECY FOR IRELAND ENCODED?

irish-flood

THE ONGOING MYSTERY OF AN ANCIENT FORECAST

A net article recently caused me to recall something long forgotten, namely that St Patrick and also St Columba are supposed to have forecast the flooding of Ireland before “the last day”. To the extent that geographically Ireland is something of a bowl with its interior bog lands near or below sea level I suppose a great ocean flood was never impossible. (The above picture derives from records of the rather ghastly floods of 2015) . But a wipe out? Does this mark just fantasy or spurious prophecy?

For little more than idle amusement I switched on the 1949 foundation chart for modern Ireland to see if there was anything remotely suggestive of such a fate. I was surprised by what I found using especially the new evidence of  name, place and concept asteroids which are found to be unusually descriptive and effective. Might the ancient prophecy be encoded there? In this instance you don’t even need to be an astrologer to appreciate what I saw and form your opinion.

A nation’s destiny and reputation is linked to its tenth house. In Ireland’s tenth sector sits Neptune, planetary symbol of any floods. This Neptune is then conjuncted by the asteroid Fini (French for finite and finished) and Fini is meaningful. It was for example definitely involved in the sudden unexpected retirement of Pope Benedict.

I then observe Neptune and Fini exist in tense axis opposition to the asteroid Flood. This in turn is in exact degree aspect to Oceana (ocean flood?). Perhaps more significantly Flood is closely conjunct asteroid Atropos. Though astrologers don’t often speak of it, it’s generally accepted nowadays that Atropos is much involved in highly fated events and death patterns. And then the Flood/Atropos combo is in exact so-called stress square to the drowning asteroid, Ophelia, itself in a water sign (Cancer) in Eire’s death house.

The fourth sector in which Flood/Atropos are placed represents the nation’s land and territory. Also its weather conditions and any places of ending like graves. The cusp of this house is exactly conjuncted by Patrice. There is no Patrick or St Patrick asteroid but Patrice is French for Patrick. So might this encode Patrick speaking for the nation’s endings?

WHAT WAS THE SAINT THINKING AND WHAT SHOULD  WE?

If Patrick ever made the forecast attributed to him, we may well ask what he meant about an event seven years before “the last day” and with a disaster deemed a favour. It looks like his scribes or those who remembered him had insufficient knowledge of “the last things”.

It looks as though Patrick believed Ireland would disappear before the so-called Tribulation or Revelation’s seven year rule of the Antichrist which itself is not, strictly speaking, followed by “the end of the world”. It would simply be the end of the era. Christ’s advent destroys the rule of the Antichrist and inaugurates a millennial rule through Israel. It signals neither the end of the world nor the Last Judgement, only the end of the world as people at the time would know it and a judgement of nations only – if such occurred within our times plainly it would correspond astrologically to the end of the age of Pisces which Christ’s birth introduced.

St Patrick evidently thought if Ireland drowned (and tsunamis would involve almost instant death as flood walls hit) that this was a deliverance of sorts from the pains of the Tribulation period with its temptations to take the damning “Mark of the Beast”. The fact that the mentioned Patrice makes exact tension square to Achristou, an asteroid I’ve long found associated with Satanism and Antichrist themes, could just encode such a train of thought.

NOT TO FORECAST BUT…

No astrologer in their right mind would or should forecast such extreme events as the Patrick prophecy envisages. The most they might affirm is that various time periods exist that held potential for heightened danger.

However….for those who crave a frisson and would wish to relate the whole idea to our times, one could state this much. The late Catholic Seeress, Jeane Dixon, celebrated especially for forecasting JFK’s death, claimed to have had vision of the birth of the Antichrist – she even maintained the entire purpose of her life and gifts was to receive especially that vision. Undeniably the birth pattern for the time was both unusual and suggestive.

If Dixon wasn’t deluded and the person of her visions happens to exist, then I would  be confident he must greatly advance and almost certainly appear before the world in late 2017 or early 2018. If not then, never, since there would be lesser opportunity before he was too old to make sufficient, persuasive impact. But the same kind of eclipses and transits that favour Dixon’s false prophet  – one of them hits on Ireland’s Saturn – bespeak some difficulty for Ireland. Difficulty and stress, certainly, but that’s not the same as saying certain wipe out!

I am thus not prepared to forecast that 2017/2018 marks Ireland’s final rendez-vous with destiny, but having said that I retain the suspicion that the Patrick forecast could actually be encoded for Ireland and manifest some day.

[ This article was proposed to a couple of leading Irish papers earlier this year when I was visiting Ireland. Both refused. I believe this belongs to the rabid, dismissive secularism of the new Irish elite which has no time for even just mysteries ; also a kind of parochialism which no longer considers the Irish diaspora has any use or meaning and can be safely ignored ]

 
1 Comment

Posted by on September 24, 2016 in Mysteries

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

CONFIRMING THE LOSS OF SHAKESPEARE’S SKULL

SKULL

CONFIRMING THE LOSS OF SHAKESPEARE’S  SKULL

Unlike a lot that swirls around the Bard, the latest Shakespeare news is true and I can confirm the theory of a Shakespeare skull theft including that a certain Frank Chambers did offer bounty to grave robbers in 1794 to do the deed.

A programme broadcast in UK on Channel 4 on 26th March (but only recently played here on Australia’s SBS), prompted me to check out the mystery and I find it all astonishingly fits. Radar has discovered disturbance near the head area of the remains of Shakespeare and at a level of three feet, the depth reported in a long dismissed seemingly gothic tale in Argosy magazine of 1879 concerning a tomb raid on the head.

I have long claimed that the Stratford Shakespeare was the true Shakespeare and that I had the true working birth chart of the Bard (11.20 am on April 23rd 1564 with 19 degrees of theatrical Leo rising). I did so long before using techniques of the new astrology that embraces such as name asteroids. These bespeak an intelligent universe for the accuracy of data they provide and which in this case includes the name Chambers.

But let’s start conventionally with planets and houses. It was one of several signs that originally assured me I was on the right track of the birth that Uranus of the odd, eccentric and surprising would be in religions sign Sagittarius in the fourth house of the last resting place. This looked to cover the notorious oddness of the blessing and curse Shakespeare placed on his grave with regard to the moving of his bones. I didn’t bother to go into the matter more than that. However….

The sign on the 4th house cusp of the grave place is not Sagittarius but Scorpio of the mysteries. Scorpio’s ruler is Pluto and it falls in the Bard’s eighth house – the death and secrets sector ( an eclipse had fallen in that sector conjunct its Pluto prior to the March broadcast, a promise of secrets to be unlocked). In that sector Pluto is in Pisces whose own ruler is Neptune…..a Neptune which for Shakespeare is degree exact opposite that eccentric grave-indicating Uranus in Sagittarius. And Neptune rules any disappearances. So would something disappear from that grave? Obviously with Scorpio, Pluto and the eighth involved the matter would be well shrouded in the very thick of mystery, but the chances for theft and disappearance would be distinctly increased.

SHAKESPEARE DATA FROM THE INTELLIGENT UNIVERSE

When dealing with asteroids you have to assume the universe is intelligent and that at some level all languages are one and that God is not an Englishman. There is no asteroid for head but there is one for Kopf or Kopff (German for head). Kopf is at 17 Virgo in the Bard’s house of money and possessions The long dismissed story about Chambers is that through the encouragement of bounty he was able to encourage grave robbers to enter the grave in Stratford’s Holy Trinity church and himself later tried to sell the head for the equivalent of 300 pounds though it seems there were problems and an attempt to return the head. Whatever, Kopf in the possessions sector and opposite the natal Pluto at 15 helps with cover-up if not with finances.

That Chambers is the natural culprit is shown by the way that at almost 3 degrees of Cancer his name is making easy fortunate trine to Shakespeare’s grave place cusp which is at 3 of Scorpio. Chambers can get away with it. The sheer improbability of the precise connection I turn up has to be relevant. Chambers himself does not conjunct a truth asteroid, he was obviously a cheat, but he does aspect one – the truth about him can be known.

The theft occurred in 1794. Suitably this was the year that slow Neptune which rules any disappearances was transiting in the early degrees of Scorpio which means affecting the sensitive 3 degree cusp of the grave place. There is no need to imagine the skull was detached at the time of burial as some would have it, the grave was disturbed in 1794.

A BROADCAST WELL TIMED FOR THE TRUTH

The timing of the broadcast on the new discoveries (26th March this year at 8 pm in London) in itself points to something of real significance being finally revealed.

The timer of events, the moon, at 12 degrees of Scorpio (i.e. passing within the chart’s grave zone) was challengingly opposite the bard’s sun at 12 Taurus. Viewers are faced with secrets and mysteries about him and death.

Highlighting the subject, transiting Mars was exact to the degree on Shakespeare’s odd Uranus in Sagittarius that defines his burial place and which had been acted upon (Mars) probed, half entered if only by radar.

Transiting Jupiter….the register of truth in any issue….was at 16 Virgo conjunct Kopff and thus opposite the natal Pluto in the death house, while opener of secrets Pluto was itself at 17 Capricorn perfectly trine the 17 degree natal Kopff. Don’t doubt the truth was given.

In stress square aspect to Jupiter but in perfect trine to Shakespeare’s Mercury (itself in Aries, sign of the head) Saturn was in Sagittarius at 16 degrees. This has implications for the solving of a long-term (Saturnian) mystery but probably also that the trail and the truth of the matter cannot proceed much further than this. Saturn so often ends things and though we can always hope, I suspect we won’t get beyond Chambers to what happened next and where. Or not for another long time.

The desideratum in this case would now be an asteroid aspecting Kopf and with the name of a town or region. I can at least affirm that won’t be London. It falls in Shakespeare’s sixth of work, appropriately so since it’s where he would labour and make his name. And actually his Shakespeare name, rather unusually for a notable person, is in the same work sector from where, especially since it ‘afflicts” his Midheaven angle covering reputation, strongly suggests he really didn’t want or greatly like his association with theatre. He simply used his work to become the major Stratford landowner he successfully aspired to become.

Shakespeare lies buried in a Protestant church. Was he a Catholic? In sympathy I should say yes, including because Vaticana is in direct aspect to his Jupiter (any religious beliefs). However asteroid Roman, if that can cover Roman Catholic, like the Shakespeare name it conjuncts (Shakespeare 4, and Roman 3 of Aquarius), oddly afflicts his career/reputation Midheaven (as well as his family and endings house, the 3 Taurus, 3 Scorpio axis). This suggests he could find the Catholic association inconvenient to his career so that pragmatically he changed it at some point. Uranus in Sagittarius would itself assist any breaks and ruptures in the sphere of religion and beliefs during he course of a life.

Had Shakespeare ever been abroad especially to Catholic Italy, the land in which so many of his plays are set? Italia is in his career house in close aspect to his writer’s Mercury which, as the latter is in the house of anything foreign and distant,the ninth, major travel is quite likely, though it might be only that he met a lot of Italians in London and read a lot of foreign material, but all things considered I think it’s likely he travelled at some point.

Reverting to the mystery of the skull theft, we can only finish by saying that Mercury is the planetary symbol not just of communications and communicators but of any thieves. The fact that Shakespeare’s rapid, no blots writing which owes something to Mercury in Aries is in precisely Aries, sign of the head, always made it rather more likely that not just his pen but his head would prove commercial to some people. And of course he had written hauntingly of skulls “poor Yorick etc.

GREATER MYSTERIES AND INCONVENIENT TRUTHS….

I am not a Shakespeare scholar but the data and insights I have on the world’s greatest dramatist are minor against the spectacular range of information I have about Christ whose birth data I have long possessed in radical development of one particular line of expert inquiry launched a few decades ago by two noted astronomers.

I am permitted to be bemused if not irritated that the discoveries about Shakespeare, important though they undeniably are, manage to get past Channel 4 when the much more detailed and exciting information I have so long held about Christ could never get through the door there despite my qualifications as writer, doctor of religious studies and astrologer. (True there are plenty of others to blame like the Church Times who unforgettably waived me away with “We know all there is to know about Jesus, we don’t need to know about the Magi”). Years ago a documentary film company advised me to speed things by going first through the head of religion at Channel 4. Despite the recommendation I was never able to get so much as an email or one moment of phone time out of the person concerned despite promises his secretary made to me. So often one is up against the merely busy dismissiveness of too many people in media. I suffered it recently from someone organizing religion for the ABC here in Australia. “I’m sorry, I’m too busy to discuss this”. Period. In short “no room at the inn” and don’t come back either.

Next month I reckon to launch an updated version to Amazon of my book on these findings which controversially has never been published despite an editor of a leading house describing the material as “groundbreaking, fascinating and publishable” So why wasn’t it published? Answers please, although in this case I believe I know why.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 2, 2016 in Mysteries

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

BEYOND DOVER BEACH: A POEM OF OUR TIMES

BEYOND DOVER BEACH: A POEM OF OUR TIMES

 

[The imagined setting of this poem is obviously England, the setting of Matthew Arnold’s original Dover Beach, but the symbolic range and topical application is wider]

BEYOND DOVER BEACH

The grey whale changes hemisphere to go
Like Jonah’s fish towards the coast of Joppa.[1]
But otherwise and elsewhere pods have beached
And dolphins died in struggle with the nets
While fish by shoals and millions wash ashore
The brine no cover to their stench of death.

These are the signs symbolic of an era’s end.

The last degree, the anaretic, gains in power
Two fish so long opposed now drift apart [2]
They lose their will, they know their time is short
The current sees them fall away, the surge
Rolls higher with each speeding year.
No Trojan horse will now make cities fall
Lies as of the luring Lorelei suffice
The sense of boundary and of barrier is lost
There’s only flood gates open to the land
Pollution, dissolution rush to drown.
As out at sea the storm clouds lower.

Meanwhile that roar of faith’s recession
First sounding on the pebbled shore [3]
Now beats amid the traffic’s hum
On main streets of the sceptics’ citadels.
There commerce wrestles with decay
And, bold against the sullen skies
Like tinsel that’s been thrown about,
Life glimmers still from out new towers
Refurbished terraces and op art shops
Down streets on which for all to see,
The chapel closed serves as an eaterie,
The church abandoned is a mosque.
The road hosts urban theatre every week
A drunken dance of death, all stupor,
Screams and vomiting, souls staggering
On pavements round the gutter’s edge,
Abandoned joy’s first port of call
Before the beds of mindless sex for those
In skirts, not yet teetotal in niqab. [4]

You should change your life. [5]

Themselves as stupefied and blurred
By toxic rivers of corroding thought,
Beyond the street on college lawn
The student staggers back and forth
Weighed down by theory of the cynic kind
And extreme doubt,[6] voicing a
Vulgar insolence and easy blasphemies.
No natural piety towards the past
Nor any learned belief remains;
Lives pass not sacred but from
First breath to the last profane….
“Believers begone or keep
Your practice private. Religion’s death.
Thank small g God to be so rid of it.
Would you offer prayer’s false hope
Or trouble minds with carolling?
All faith is mad. Consider circumcision;
That’s assault. Would you abuse an unfree child?
Will you defend the fascist state of Jews?”

Despite convictions built on shifting sands
Of randomness in nature, for science and
The goddess Reason’s world all’s
Theorem-clear, all’s geometric light.
It can’t allow design, cannot permit
That God or shape might work within.
For stumblers in the agnostic night
Deity must be nowhere now unless
Outside; and currently God’s somewhere
Dead. And death itself’s not much, an incident,
Or else, like life, “get over it”.

You should change your thought.

But purblind and disloyal now
To all inheritance they are
Their guilt and generous deeds misplaced.
Directionless they’ve travelled far
The C.E, all-inclusive world [7]
So ardent for neutrality
And near fanatic for equality
They’re noisy to protect most faith,
Except the known, assured in vain
It’s education holds the key
And trump card’s power to
What’s the privately intended aim
A secular enlightenment.
And thus they scarcely take offence while
Foolish laws and judges worse
Who hesitate to fine a thief
Decide will Christians wear a cross
Or speak of credo or of prayer at work.
All’s relative, except for that.

Meanwhile in near conformity
Led by non leaders at the helm
Declining churches wrangle on
By day and night on women’s rights
And could gay couples walk the aisle [8]
Uncaring or else unaware.
Too many Christians have been slain
Confined, restrained, or lost
All rights to worship and to normal life.

Say something! But you know you can’t.
Weak as a palsied patient, go limping on
Lukewarm as Laodicea and worse.

Preach! But you do not have the words
Unless it’s “love”, by which you mean but
Universal toleration, each soul the same.

Cowards and hypocrites of false Enlightenment
Defenders of all rights except what’s most essential
You did not choose or just forgot, or maybe feared,
To speak of any matter lest the guests complain
And call mere mention of an obvious truth, “discrimination”.

Nigeria and Somalia,
Sudan and Indonesia,
Afghanistan and Pakistan,
Iran, Iraq and Syria
Guinea, Mali, Kazakhstan
Egypt and Eritrea land so dark [9]
The finger points though you don’t see
You will not hear, will not report
Or else turn evidence conveniently
To nothing but a tribal war
Or race or stresses of economy.
You live within a Dar al Harb. [10] You’re
Drifted nearer to extremes of war.
You’ll disappear with those you scorned,
Ignored and almost always failed to aid.
And so submit. It’s all that you have left to do
You have no will or choice but to
Absorb, assimilate and accept
Until your sinking boat goes lost
Within the fogs to which you steered.

Religion knows no vacuum
Nor end of tides, its nature
Is it will return to fill the empty
Rock pools of the secular sands;
And as the mad philosopher declared [11]
All faiths are cruel, but if that’s so,
Or seems, it is because like hornets
Who pursue the waves, it’s devils chase,
Pursue and ride each spiritual tide.
Learn to discern it and discriminate!

But you, for whom God seems but absent
Or responsible for every evil in the world
Or not restraining it at every turn,
Perceive the “wrath” of God aright:
It’s God withdrawn, protection’s end
For all that now and here below
God does not own. [12] You would not learn
Or hear, or in the right ways fear,
(Your pride and aspiration hurt)
That Evil rules the freewill world
And now, by your own selves invoked,
Its weight of darkness blots the sky.
Seas rise, storms rage, floods overwhelm
Tsunamis hurtle to the shore
And like the fleeing refugee you sink,
Bewildered victim to a ruthless fate.
The magian heralds of the era’s span
(Unless themselves obliged to flee
New forms of arrogance and power),
Do not return declaring what will be.

The next age dawn shines distantly,
More promise than for you true hope.
Before the glimmer will become sun blaze
Before the gleam turns morning’s light,
With lightning that divides the skies [13]
Much will dissolve, too much occur.

You must change your life.

(Rollan McCleary. Copyright 2013. This poem with others published on this blog will be included in New Poems and Two Celtic Plays which should be available on Amazon before Christmas).

NOTES

1. The grey whale is native to the Pacific, not the Mediterranean. Its appearance off Israel in May 2010 occasioned much surprise. The book of Jonah is usually taken as allegorical but that a more literal reading was intended can be supported to the extent God is described as having specially “appointed” or “chosen” a whale (Joh 1:17) so that the exceptional is positively envisaged. Some have asked was the whale which appeared outside Tel Aviv (ancient Joppa from which Jonah sailed) likewise “appointed”.

2. The last or 29th degree of a sign is called anaretic. It is insatiable exaggerating features of the outgoing sign as a candle flame is strong at last burst. The “opposed” fish are the east/west facing fish of the sign of Pisces. 29 Pisces is deemed one of the worst on the zodiac with implications for murder, suicide, drowning, poisoning. An era’s end (they last approximately 2000 years) will have anaretic features (like the excess of violence and blood in even Roman entertainments at the end of Aries) so concluding Pisces has much to do with death by water but also Neptunian deceptions.

3. “Listen you hear the grating roar/Of pebbles which the waves draw back…”. Matthew Arnold, Dover Beach

4. The alcohol fuelled weekend behaviour of England’s bachelorette girls is notorious. It is suggested these celebrants mighty one day be either forced, or just like the White Widow by way of reaction, succumb to some opposite extreme in terms of modesty and abstinence.

5. Du musst dein Leben andern (You must change your life) Rilke, Archaic Torso of Apollo,in Sonnets to Orpheus

6. Not classical Greek cynicism but more like what critic Harold Bloom dubs “The New Cynicism” he sees represented by various intellectual and academic trends like post-structuralism, deconstructionism etc which incline to negation of individualism, of ethics and most things in a way to dissolve common perception towards a paralysing relativity.

7. C.E. Current Era, rather than A.D.

8. It’s not that concern with women’s or gay rights is illegitimate, only that the attention given is disproportionate to that accorded other issues, the hardships, persecutions, dire sentencing of Christians – recently in the supposedly liberalized Iran of Rowhani to 80 lashes for just drinking communion wine http://bit.ly/176CsuB – in societies from Egypt to Pakistan. In the latter nation Christians can be lifelong bullied by vigilantes even if law courts absolve them of blasphemy charges under a law that encourages every corruption. (Recently a Pakistani journalist was threatened with death for even reporting the plight of Christians).The many abuses are so little advertised the multicultural “tolerance” of Britain’s BBC hands leadership of religious broadcasting of a traditionally Christian society into the hands of a Pakistani Muslim no more vocal about his country’s wrongs than Baroness Warsi, Britain’s Pakistani minister for Communities and Faith who reasonably avers Europe should be more confident in its Christianity while not acknowledging Christians in Pakistan have no chance to be the same. This poem was written in October during which on the 21st Muslim radicals invaded the Syrian Christian towns of Saddad and Haffar, holding 3000 hostage for a week using many children as human shields. 14 churches were attacked, schools, businesses and homes looted and wrecked, the hospital destroyed. 2500 people fled. Subsequently between 45 and 70 dead bodies, many children, have been found. The incident like many similar outrages against Christians globally, (not just in Muslim countries), scarcely reached western media. It’s an inconvenient truth. A church leader in Saddad said….”We cried out to the world and no one heard us. Where is the Christian conscience?”. Where indeed? Number one offender against “Christian conscience” is President Obama, who has not only supported the Muslim Brotherhood guilty of so many murders of Egyptian Copts but whom it took endless petitioning and over 1 million signatures to even raise the issue of injustices done to American citizen, Pastor Saheed in Iran. Obama’s real politik has only ever been vocal to condemn soldiers in Afghanistan talking Christianity – in a country which reckons to execute any convert, a situation so grave for basic liberties it would have justified the West never supporting Afghanistan for anything. But for the “Christian” Obama the call of the muezzin to prayer is the most beautiful sound in the world. A poet would need the satirical gifts of a Juvenal to evoke the elements of vacillation, contradiction, and weakness that characterize this president.

9. Eritrea is not an Islamic society but its human rights record and extreme inhumanity, not least towards many Christians, is scarcely better than that of atheist North Korea, the world’s leading rights abuser. Its leader is Eritrean Orthodox, a fact which joins with my critical position regarding Orthodoxy more generally (see Icon World – July blog) whose social and political policies have been consistently such for centuries it can only sometimes merit the name of Christian at all.

10. Dar Al Harb. All non Muslim territories and even Muslim territories where Sharia is not strictly imposed are defined – by at any rate fundamentalists – as the place of war/chaos as opposed to the Dar al Islam, where peace naturally reigns because the system has imposed rightful submission (Islam). Non Muslim territory is a chaos either by its own nature or it may become so through the struggle to impose Islam fully.

11. Nietzsche.

12. The original Christian view progressively obscured or denied by religious philosophy which preferred the image of a wholly omnipotent God was that the world was cursed and owned by evil. The question of God and evil is considered in my Cosmic Father 2008

13. The coming of the Utopian Aquarian age either will or will not be the Millennium. But it is not just a sunburst; it should enter suddenly, surprisingly as per the sign’s glyph, the lightning flash.

 
4 Comments

Posted by on November 7, 2013 in Mysteries, Poetry, religion

 

Tags: , , , , ,

PEOPLE WHO WRITE AND TALK ABOUT JESUS AND WHY

THE SECRET PRINCIPLE OF CONNECTION WITH FAME

I have long maintained that only some people can notably and influentially talk, write or research about Jesus. It’s useful to see who and why. It’s the same principle as will apply to Shakespeare and other celebrated persons, but it’s not necessarily involved with levels of accurate information, agreement or whatever for the person considered

In London, the BBC once again managed to spark controversy over religion by broadcasting Lenten talks in one of which Benjamin Cohen, a conflicted gay Jew but a successful journalist, businessman and founder of Pink News, spoke of Christ and abandonment and compared the crucifixion of Christ to problems of being gay.

I have not heard the broadcast in Australia but was curious as to why Cohen could say what he said and manage to do that so easily. I wrote to him via Pink News, (and so far haven’t received acknowledgement), suggesting why the figure of Jesus had strongly engaged him. The astrological rule is quite simply that it’s impossible to be notably for or against a leading figure without close major ties to their natus. Few cases known to me however display quite so many ties as Cohen but this explains how he can unexpectedly be asked and allowed to expound his exceptional thesis. Manifest connection of this sort is yet again proof that the birth data of Jesus can be known and now are so. Cohen was born 14th Aug 1982. Cohen’s data is to given to the left, Jesus’s data to the right.

Sun, 20 Leo……………………….conjunct MC (destiny/reputation) and IC (origins, family) axis for Jesus of 20 Aquarius/20 Leo
Moon……………………………..(something in early Gemini depending on birth time). Jesus has 8.40 Gemini moon at birth and Ascendant degree at 8.50
Mercury at 9 Virgo……………….. conjunct Jesus’ Pluto at 10 Virgo
Venus at 29 Cancer or 0 Leo….   conjunct Jesus’asteroid Cohen at 1 Leo
Mars, 6 Scorpio………………….   conjunct Jesus’ Venus at almost 5 Scorpio
Jupiter, 3 Scorpio………………..  conjunct Jesus’ Neptune (the Christ planet) at 3 Scorpio
Saturn 18 Libra…………………. . conjunct asteroid Christian at 18 Libra
Pluto 24 Libra………………….. .  conjunct asteroids Masi (Messiah) at almost 24 and Christ at 24 Libra
(Neptune 24 Sagittarius……….    sextile asteroid Christ at 24 Libra
Uranus 0 Sagittarius……………   conjunct Part of Self Undoing, trine Cohen at 1 Leo.
(To explain a point. The Part of Self Undoing seems involved with the point eclipsed before the crucifixion to which Christ gave himself up).

I have not included any contact wider than 2 degrees though many astrologers would.

Opposition aspects reflect either actual opposition or challenges to be resolved. Conjunctions are strong agreements or disagreements depending upon the factors and persons engaged.

CONTROVERSIAL WRITERS ON JESUS

Compare Benjamin Cohen’s pattern with recent Booker Prize winner, J.M Coetzee, who has just issued a mysterious novel, The Childhood of Jesus. It portrays what one critic has called a bratty kind of young Jesus one would sometimes like to hit. Plainly Coetzee isn’t representing any very Christian views! The pattern as it affects Christ’s chart is however interesting. Coetzee was born 9th Feb 1940.

Sun at 19 + Aquarius………………conjunct the 20 Aquarius reputation Midheaven
Mars 24 Aries……………………… opposite asteroid Masi (Messiah) and Christ at 23 and 24 Libra
Jupiter 7 Aries…………………….   opportunity sextiles asteroid CHILD at 7 Aquarius
Saturn 26 Aries……………………..opposite asteroid Isa (Ar. Jesus)
Nodes 23 Libra……………………..conjunct asteorid Masi (Messiah)

Coetzee’s pattern interestingly compares with humanist atheist Phillip Pullman (19th Oct 1946),author of The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ

Sun at 25 Libra…………………… conjunct asteroid Isa (Ar. Jesus)
Mars at 15 Scorpio……………….  conjunct asteroid Malus (Bad) at 15 and Sethos/Set/Satan at 16
Venus 0 Sagittarius……………..   conjunct Part of Self Undoing (see above)
And other factors I won’t get into controversies citing.

Someone keen to write a biography of Jesus and have the real facts was the just retired Pope Benedict who did the job across 3 volumes. Suitably we find:

Sun at 25 Aries……………………. Opposite Isa (Ar. Jesus) at 25 Libra
Ascendant at 19.11 Pisces…..   .  .Conjunct “his star” messianic Jupiter at 19.23 Pisces
Jupiter at 20.33 Pisces…………… Conjunct “his star” messianic Jupiter at 19.23 Pisces
Moon at 14 Libra…………………. .Conjunct Mercury at 13.54

In my own case my researches are facilitated or fated by “his star” at 19 Pisces trining my Mercury/Venus conjunction on 20 Scorpio where they also conjunct Christ’s Mars at 21 Scorpio. My sun at 5 Scorpio conjunct Christ’s 3 degree Neptune and 4 degree Venus in Scorpio. The asteroid that works for me Rollandia- asteroids were originally registered in feminine form – similarly to Brown which works for Dan Brown, is opposite “his star”.

In passing I would mention I doubt that by comparison with his papal predecessor Pope Francis will be saying, writing or knowing exceptional, controversial things about Jesus; he seeks only to be a suitable follower in a more general way. His chart is less directly linked to Jesus’ natus (to the extent we know it). I would note there seems now to be some evidence from a birth certificate of 9 pm (another feminine sign on the ascendant rather than Pisces) discussed last blog. With Cancer rising we might expect someone rather strongly dedicated to the Virgin. [Pope Francis dedicated the world to the Virgin on Oct 13th]

The affinities and connections I have demonstrated for writing and speaking somewhat carry over to film and theatrical representation of Jesus. Jim Caviezel who represents one of the better portrayals of Jesus in film, even if The Passion of the Christ cannot be deemed the best enactment of the gospel as such, shows at birth – and remember Jupiter is crucial for the success of actors and acting.

Jupiter at 20.12 Virgo…………….to Jesus’ Sun at 20.14 Virgo
and there are other points of contact including to Jesus’ Uranus

At the recent premiere (i.e.like a birth pattern) for the phenomenally successful Bible TV series in America which is said to have a very good section on the gospels, transiting Neptune was closely conjunct Jesus’ Uranus which is meaningful as the producers claimed the most “God moment” of the whole filming was when Jesus speaks of the Spirit and a wind suddenly springs up from nowhere. Neptune for astrologers is Christ and Uranus is the Spirit in any religious contexts, hence the most telling moment would suitably be in connection with Jesus and the Spirit

THE ONGOING AND CONTEMPORARY MIRROR OF JESUS

The main thing to register is that vocal, controversial opinions around Jesus really do register on his chart perhaps especially the angles affecting reputation and image as I noted in
Testament of the Magi. http://amzn.to/ZwFuoY

It’s not an absolute rule, but perhaps because connection with planets is more likely to show understanding, hostility and misunderstanding tends to show up more in relation to the angles like Jack Miles with his rather profane Christ: A Crisis in the Life of God has his limiting Saturn conjunct Christ’s ascendant

Satanist Aleister Crowley shows limiting, doubting, hostile Saturn conjunct Christ’s reputation Midheaven and Uranus conjunct the opposite IC angle. On the other hand, the pioneering theologian Carsten Thiede of The Jesus Papyrus about a fragment that would date Matthew’s gospel very early, has Nodes and Pluto across the same angles; he is researching and contributing to seeing Jesus differently.

The data for Christ’s birth have been found and they act as a mirror for persons and events to this day. It is possible even to read much about Christ’s life from this data, certainly to read very clearly and exactly what occurred at the Easter Week and when it occurred which people and scholars say they want to know the truth of, but do they?

The sheer statistical improbability of what one has uncovered (in radical development of various theories of the late astronomer Ferrari D’Occhieppo and astrophysicist David Hughes who has stubbornly refused all contact despite appeals form myself and influential others presumably because he dare not contaminate his reputation with “astrology”) not to say its clarity and consistency on so many issues cannot be dismissed, yet it is.

It is possible even to read much about Christ’s life from this data, certainly to read very clearly and exactly what occurred at the Easter Week and when it occurred which people and scholars say they want to know the truth concerning, but do they? I’ll not talk about abandonment and rejection in the shadow of Christ, which perhaps I know better than those who talk about Christ in relation to history, gay issues or anything else. I’ll not make a list of all those who have ignored or insulted me for no reason but the list is long and outrageous in the circumstances – I could at least be somewhat trusted as a doctor of religious studies.

Certainly since much of this can be called “astrology” from scientist to theologians no one wants to know lest it blow open certain preconceptions. “We know all there is to know about Jesus, we don’t need to know about the Magi” as I was airily told by The Church Times in London. Perhaps some humility is needed, a good lesson at Easter.

[July 10th ’13]. An additional perspective on those writing on Jesus is given at the end of  July’s posting headed, Icon World

[Feb 24th ’14] Perspectives on film, art and images of Jesus as they connect or otherwise to Jesus’ birth data is included in the article Colton Burpo’s ‘Real Heaven’, Akiane’s Jesus and New Christ Images in the Feb feature at   http://wp.me/p2v96G-lH

 
1 Comment

Posted by on March 22, 2013 in astrology, Mysteries, religion

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

 
%d bloggers like this: